This post has been updated with an October 4, 2019 U.S. Supreme Court development.  Please visit this link for the updated article. 

 

 

 
 

2 Comments

  1. Jason Burns says:

    Very glad I found this – I always wondered what Roe v. Wade actually meant. Very helpful.

  2. Doug Yowell says:

    Lee Boothby also argued that an unborn baby could not be identified as a person unless one resorted to a theological(religious)argument. Thus he publicly opposed efforts to legally criminalize abortion on the grounds that it was the state using religion to further it's political purposes.

Post a Comment


 

 
 
%d bloggers like this: