immigration rally - flickr - creative commons

On May 12, Rep. Donald Beyer (D-Va) and 103 co-sponsors introduced legislation that would prohibit immigration authorities from refusing to admit aliens based on religion or lack of religion. The "Freedom of Religion Act of 2016" (H.R. 5207) was introduced in response to presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump's campaign proposal in December 2015 calling for "a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on."

Introducing the bill, Congressman Beyer called the bill "an appeal to hope rather than fear" and stated that, "we cannot allow fear and paranoia to drive our public policy, especially when it comes to defining the values of our country."

He continued, "Our Founding Fathers guaranteed religious freedom for all in the First Amendment to our Constitution. People all around the world look to us as the standard for freedom, liberty, and tolerance."

The bill would add the following language to the Immigration and Nationality Act:

"Notwithstanding any other provision of the immigration laws, an alien may not be denied admission to the United States because of the alien’s religion or lack of religious beliefs."

According to Congressman Beyer, the bill is not intended to prohibit requests for asylum brought by people who are being persecuted because of their religious faith, but rather the focus of the bill is on preventing people from being denied immigration because of their religion.

The bill is supported by a wide range of religious and other advocacy organizations as a religious liberty measure, and the bill is currently under consideration by the Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security.

The current language and status of H.R. 5207 are available at Congress.gov.

(Pictured: Immigration rally in 2006 – Photo by Britt Selvitelle – Creative Commons)

 
 

1 Comment

  1. Marylin George says:

    We don't want to base our public policy on fear or paranoia to determine the values of our country, but it may be wise to allow caution to drive public policy.
    We have already allowed fear to allow torture as policy. We've already allowed fear-based disposal of our civil rights. Maybe we need an immigration screening policy based rationally on criminal record and cultural value of force and violence. We are talking about a policy that is cautionary and takes the time to vet individuals. We are not God, reading hearts, so yes, some good people are denied entry along with others screened out. That is unfair. It was also unfair that righteous Daniel was included with rebellious kinsmen during the Israeli emigration to Babylon. But God had a purpose to bless both Israelis and Babylonians. We know from prophecy that America is being torn usunder and we do not need to cooperate with the demise, allowing realities too big for we mortals to manage.

 
 
%d bloggers like this: