ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®  – News and Updates on Religious Liberty and Freedom
Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Church and State
  • In the News
  • In the News
  • Supreme Court
  • Free Speech
  • Legislation
Menu

Doug Kmiec on a Court Packed with Catholics (Wall Street Journal)

Posted on June 1, 2009June 1, 2009 by Michael Peabody

If Judge Sonia Sotomayor is confirmed by the United States Senate, she will be the 6th Catholic among the 9 United States Supreme Court justices. Doug Kmiec, my constitutional law professor in the area of the Bill of Rights at Pepperdine University, discusses what this will mean in a recent interview with Suzanne Sataline of the Wall Street Journal .  Kmiec is a former White House adviser under both President Reagan and the first President Bush and a devout Roman Catholic.   Michael Peabody, Editor RLTV

EXCERPT:

Hi Professor Kmeic. So what will be the impact of having Catholics comprise two-thirds of the justices on the Supreme Court?

The Catholic understanding is that the nature of the office has to be respected and the judicial office . . . should not be a policy making position and the church does not assume it is . . . . It would be an entirely improper criticism for any churchman to make of Judge Sotomayor that she needs to rule in a way that is dictated by the faith. She is to follow the law as it is given to her and that is the oath she takes.

…

In what sorts of cases can we see those beliefs in action?

[Kmiec said he’s read about 50 or 100 of her rulings, perhaps a quarter of her authored opinions.] She does seem to be particularly sensitive to freedom of religion issues. She protected inmates in prison, for instance, who asked to have their faith traditions accommodated.

Read the full article at http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2009/05/27/doug-kmiec-on-a-court-packed-with-catholics/

Category: Constitution, Current Events, Supreme Court

2 thoughts on “Doug Kmiec on a Court Packed with Catholics (Wall Street Journal)”

  1. Lisa says:
    July 7, 2009 at 7:15 pm

    I had a great comment and forgot to hit submit! So here it is again.

    It would be my hope that a supreme court justice would make rulings based on Constitutional Law and not on their religious beliefs. I would hope that a justice would not try to infuse their rulings with the religious values and traditions of their upbringing but instead interpret the Constitution as it stands. That is how we will remain a free country. With that said, I also don’t think it would be fair to disqualify a nominee because of their religious background. They should also be judged on the merit of previous rulings in lower courts.

    Again, I can’t believe I forgot to hit the submit comment button. My first attempt at leaving my thoughts was much more eloquent!

    Thanks for causing me to think about this issue.
    Lisa

  2. Lisa says:
    July 7, 2009 at 12:15 pm

    I had a great comment and forgot to hit submit! So here it is again.

    It would be my hope that a supreme court justice would make rulings based on Constitutional Law and not on their religious beliefs. I would hope that a justice would not try to infuse their rulings with the religious values and traditions of their upbringing but instead interpret the Constitution as it stands. That is how we will remain a free country. With that said, I also don’t think it would be fair to disqualify a nominee because of their religious background. They should also be judged on the merit of previous rulings in lower courts.

    Again, I can’t believe I forgot to hit the submit comment button. My first attempt at leaving my thoughts was much more eloquent!

    Thanks for causing me to think about this issue.
    Lisa

Comments are closed.

©2025 ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom® – News and Updates on Religious Liberty and Freedom
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experience, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}