• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®

ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®

religious liberty and religious freedom news

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Articles
  • Podcast
Home » Article18: Canada — Sikhs Upset After Quebec National Assembly Bans Religious Daggers; Controversy Reignites Multiculturalism Debate

Article18: Canada — Sikhs Upset After Quebec National Assembly Bans Religious Daggers; Controversy Reignites Multiculturalism Debate

February 12, 2011 by Martin Surridge

By Martin Surridge – While the incredible events in Egypt continue to capture the hearts and minds of viewers and listeners around the globe, traditionally progressive and reliably tolerant Canada has been making unexpected headlines this week, unusually deciding to curb the religious rights of some of its citizens. This is Article18-RLTV’s weekly blog specifically dedicated to religious liberty issues in other countries around the world. Each week, we focus on a different nation, and the struggles facing one of its religious communities. This week: Canada and the French-speaking province of Quebec, where the National Assembly “carried a motion tabled by the Parti Québécois” to deny entry into the building for any Sikhs wearing the ceremonial dagger known as the kirpan. The decision, unfavorably received by many in the inter-faith community, is widely believed to be linked to efforts to ban the niqab–the traditional headdress worn by Muslim women.

Sikhs in North America have endured a torrid time in the years following the attacks on the World Trade Center. Often discriminated against and incorrectly labeled as Muslims because of the turbans that traditional Sikh men wear, adherents of the world’s fifth largest religion, and largest non-Abrahamic monotheistic faith, make up a significant portion of the diverse religious fabric of Canada. Sikhs place much of their spiritual emphasis on the importance of symbolic items, including the aforementioned turbans, a steel bracelet known as the kara, which represents strength and integrity, and perhaps most famously the kirpan, worn to symbolize “readiness to defend the defenseless, defend one’s faith against persecution [and exemplify] the warrior character of a Sikh.” However, Sikhs do not consider the kirpan to be an actual weapon, despite fears by French Canadian politicians that it could be used as one in the future.

News of the ban fell worryingly on the ears of Ontario Liberal MP Navdeep Bains during the days before its impending passage. Bains, a practicing Sikh who wears the kirpan, explained his surprise.

“I’ve worn [the kirpan] to the Supreme Court of Canada, even to the U.S. Congress and it’s never been an issue. It’s designed to remind me that I have a certain obligations to myself and society, and to look out for others. It really is a symbolic and internal way to focus myself, and hold myself accountable in a public way. If there’s a legitimate concern around the kirpan I think we should have an open and frank and honest discussion [rather than simply calling for a ban]. I expected better from my elected-official federal colleagues. We should avoid fear-mongering and politicizing the matter.”

The future of the ban is unclear at best. The measure will have to pass an all-party body in the House of Commons and the Supreme Court has already ruled favorably on the kirpan at least once before, voting 8-0 to prevent it from being banned in a Quebec school five years ago.

However, the decision made by the National Assembly in Quebec is an odd one. Claiming a desire to increase security in government buildings and minimize the risk of any danger, the legislature security team suggested the restriction, after four security guards stopped four Sikhs from entering the National Assembly last week, despite the easy access to steak knives, still available in the building’s cafeteria. There are also concerns that, despite the stated preference for safety over religious liberty, there is a cultural battle eager to be won by conservative Quebecers who worry that religious and cultural diversity will change their way of life.

When discussing the issue, Louise Beaudoin, party member of the Parti Québécois and its critic for secularism, confirmed suspicions that perhaps the issue is not really about security when he stated that, “Multiculturalism may be a Canadian value, but it’s not a Quebec one.”

Article18 is a weekly blog written by Martin Surridge, Associate Editor of Religious Liberty TV. Article18 logo and artwork created by Bradley Kenyon.

Beaudoin

Filed Under: Article18, Current Events

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Reachtome says

    February 18, 2011 at 12:19 pm

    Yes security is a great concern and positive steps should be taken to strengthen the safety system of any nation but it should be done in a manner which would not hamper the morales or sentiments associated with any religion.

  2. Reachtome says

    February 18, 2011 at 5:19 am

    Yes security is a great concern and positive steps should be taken to strengthen the safety system of any nation but it should be done in a manner which would not hamper the morales or sentiments associated with any religion.

  3. Vsuba1970 says

    February 18, 2011 at 1:54 pm

    yes I am also accepting this concept. Every body should consider each person’s own feelings and value of their religious activities as well as their culture. No body have rights to hurt other religion.

  4. Vsuba1970 says

    February 18, 2011 at 6:54 am

    yes I am also accepting this concept. Every body should consider each person’s own feelings and value of their religious activities as well as their culture. No body have rights to hurt other religion.

  5. Fjacinta says

    February 19, 2011 at 9:39 am

    Rising terrorism has given cause for suspicion. It would be in the interests of everybody if the world would become a safer place to live in, but we have to tread cautiously and counteract these evils through dialogue and understanding and lay down rules instead of bans.

  6. Fjacinta says

    February 19, 2011 at 2:39 am

    Rising terrorism has given cause for suspicion. It would be in the interests of everybody if the world would become a safer place to live in, but we have to tread cautiously and counteract these evils through dialogue and understanding and lay down rules instead of bans.

  7. Ryhnobrez12 says

    February 20, 2011 at 12:34 am

    Security should be essential to the country of Egypt because of the chaos that is going on. The riots in the street cause havoc and isn’t good for the community.

  8. Ryhnobrez12 says

    February 19, 2011 at 5:34 pm

    Security should be essential to the country of Egypt because of the chaos that is going on. The riots in the street cause havoc and isn’t good for the community.

  9. Neil Armstrong says

    February 20, 2011 at 3:10 am

    It is unfrtunate that Sikhs get confused with Muslims. The blame belongs at the feet of radical “Islamo-fascists” who slaughter in the name of their corrupted, hijacked faith. The blame does not belong at the feet of those trying to protect against their homocidal lust.

  10. Neil Armstrong says

    February 19, 2011 at 8:10 pm

    It is unfrtunate that Sikhs get confused with Muslims. The blame belongs at the feet of radical “Islamo-fascists” who slaughter in the name of their corrupted, hijacked faith. The blame does not belong at the feet of those trying to protect against their homocidal lust.

  11. Jeff Wrightman says

    February 20, 2011 at 3:23 am

    If you willingly migrate to live with people in another country, you must expect some changes in your life. These people are not in India, they are in Canada. They are not the majority and do not make the laws of the country. Although I personally feel that the issue of the small ceremonial knives should not be an issue.

  12. Jeff Wrightman says

    February 19, 2011 at 8:23 pm

    If you willingly migrate to live with people in another country, you must expect some changes in your life. These people are not in India, they are in Canada. They are not the majority and do not make the laws of the country. Although I personally feel that the issue of the small ceremonial knives should not be an issue.

  13. Philipb says

    February 20, 2011 at 3:57 am

    I believe everyone who tries to tell a person which religion to follow is a control freak. Religion and God is personal to every human, and no one should dictate how a person chooses to live his religious life.

  14. Philipb says

    February 19, 2011 at 8:57 pm

    I believe everyone who tries to tell a person which religion to follow is a control freak. Religion and God is personal to every human, and no one should dictate how a person chooses to live his religious life.

  15. Stanjensen says

    April 2, 2011 at 4:22 pm

    A few years ago, the Sikh kids were denied access to the public school system in Quebec over the kirpan. The Adventist School took them in.

  16. Stanjensen says

    April 2, 2011 at 9:22 am

    A few years ago, the Sikh kids were denied access to the public school system in Quebec over the kirpan. The Adventist School took them in.

Primary Sidebar

Geneva, Switzerland - December 03, 2019: World Health Organization (WHO / OMS) Headquarters - DepositPhotos.com

Biden admin could hand over US control of health emergencies to WHO next week

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The ultimate control over America’s health care and its national sovereignty will be put up for a vote next week at a meeting of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) governing legislative body, the World Health Assembly (WHA).  On May 22-28, 2022, the 75th World Health Assembly will convene at the United Nations […]

Statement on the Leak in Dobbs

The leak was intended to disrupt the processing of the decision and we are not going to dignify the leak or the unidentified leaker by analyzing it prematurely. As a constitutional republic we cannot go down that road without doing severe damage to the institution of the Supreme Court where there must be professional courtesy between the justices and their staffs.

Boston City Hall - photo from Supreme Court Opinion

Supreme Court rules 9-0 that Boston violated 1st Amendment in refusing Christian flag at City Hall

This morning the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Shurtleff v. Boston (Dec’d 5/2/2022) that the city of Boston violated the free speech rights of a Christian group when it refused to allow them to participate in a city flag raising program.

Active Liberty - a survey of Justice Stephen Breyer's religion clause jurisprudence - Supreme Court

Active Liberty: A Survey of Justice Stephen Breyer’s Religion Clause Decisions

A comprehensive review of retiring Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer’s decisions in Free Exercise and Establishment Clause cases.

Canadian gov’t calculates that expansion of assisted suicide will save taxpayers millions of dollars

In Canada, it is easier for the disabled who do not suffer terminal illness to get approval for assisted suicide than approval for affordable housing. The government has calculated the cost of providing healthcare versus providing assisted suicide.

Random Quote

“Cruelty and wrong are not the greatest forces in the world. There is nothing eternal in them. Only love is eternal.”

— Elisabeth Elliot

Get the ReligiousLiberty.TV Newsletter!

Comes out a couple of times a month. Unsubscribe anytime automatically, no questions asked.
* = required field
unsubscribe from list

powered by MailChimp!

Copyright © 2022 Founders' First Freedom is a registered trademark. All rights reserved.

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Articles
  • Podcast
0
0
0
0