• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®

ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®

religious liberty and religious freedom news

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Articles
  • Podcast
Home » Bill Would Ban Gov’t Discrimination Based on Religious Views of Marriage

Bill Would Ban Gov’t Discrimination Based on Religious Views of Marriage

June 18, 2015 by ReligiousLiberty.TV

Dark sky over the US Capitol building dome in Washington DC.
Photo Credit: DepositPhotos.com / trekandshoot

Bills have been introduced in both houses of the U.S. Congress that would prohibit the Federal government from discriminating against individuals, associations, and businesses that act in accordance with their religious beliefs about marriage.

Yesterday, Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) and Rep. Raúl Labrador (R-ID) introduced the First Amendment Defense Act, S. 1598 (https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/1598) and H.R. 2802 (https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/2802), which would prohibit any federal agency from denying a tax exemption, grant, contract, license, or certification to any individual, association, or business that acts in accordance with their religious beliefs about marriage.

Sen. Mike Lee
Sen. Mike Lee

Under the bill, the IRS would be prohibited from removing tax exemptions from schools that refuse to hire teachers based on their marital status, churches that refuse to solemnize same-sex marriages, or bakers who refuse wedding-related services to same-sex couples. It is noted that the proposed legislation does not single out religious institutions, and that it addresses the religious beliefs of businesses which are provided First Amendment Rights according to the 2014 Supreme Court decision in Hobby Lobby.

Rep. Raúl Labrador
Rep. Raúl Labrador

According to bill sponsor Senator Lee, “You don’t need to subscribe to any particular faith, or hold any particular beliefs about marriage, to see the danger of a government forcing innocent people to violate their conscience when they are just trying to make a living, serve their community or educate the next generation.”

Critics of the proposed legislation argue that religious beliefs are already protected by the First Amendment and that this bill simply provides a legal basis for businesses to discriminate. , S. 1598 (https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/1598) and H.R. 2802 (https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/2802),

There are currently 18 co-sponsors in the Senate and 57 co-sponsors in the House. Similar bills introduced in the 113th Congress failed. The current, 114th Congress, bills were introduced just days before the U.S. Supreme Court is anticipated to issue its ruling in a major same-sex marriage case, Obergefell v. Hodges.

You can track the 114th Congress bills here:

S. 1598 – https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/1598

H.R. 2802 –  https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/2802

Filed Under: Constitution, Employment Law, Legislation, Marriage, Tax Exemption Tagged With: Discrimination, First Amendment, Hobby Lobby, Obergefell, religious liberty, Same-Sex Marriage

Primary Sidebar

Geneva, Switzerland - December 03, 2019: World Health Organization (WHO / OMS) Headquarters - DepositPhotos.com

Biden admin could hand over US control of health emergencies to WHO next week

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The ultimate control over America’s health care and its national sovereignty will be put up for a vote next week at a meeting of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) governing legislative body, the World Health Assembly (WHA).  On May 22-28, 2022, the 75th World Health Assembly will convene at the United Nations […]

Statement on the Leak in Dobbs

The leak was intended to disrupt the processing of the decision and we are not going to dignify the leak or the unidentified leaker by analyzing it prematurely. As a constitutional republic we cannot go down that road without doing severe damage to the institution of the Supreme Court where there must be professional courtesy between the justices and their staffs.

Boston City Hall - photo from Supreme Court Opinion

Supreme Court rules 9-0 that Boston violated 1st Amendment in refusing Christian flag at City Hall

This morning the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Shurtleff v. Boston (Dec’d 5/2/2022) that the city of Boston violated the free speech rights of a Christian group when it refused to allow them to participate in a city flag raising program.

Active Liberty - a survey of Justice Stephen Breyer's religion clause jurisprudence - Supreme Court

Active Liberty: A Survey of Justice Stephen Breyer’s Religion Clause Decisions

A comprehensive review of retiring Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer’s decisions in Free Exercise and Establishment Clause cases.

Canadian gov’t calculates that expansion of assisted suicide will save taxpayers millions of dollars

In Canada, it is easier for the disabled who do not suffer terminal illness to get approval for assisted suicide than approval for affordable housing. The government has calculated the cost of providing healthcare versus providing assisted suicide.

Random Quote

To sit back hoping that someday, some way, someone will make things right is to go on feeding the crocodile, hoping he will eat you last – but eat you he will.

— Ronald Reagan

Get the ReligiousLiberty.TV Newsletter!

Comes out a couple of times a month. Unsubscribe anytime automatically, no questions asked.
* = required field
unsubscribe from list

powered by MailChimp!

Copyright © 2022 Founders' First Freedom is a registered trademark. All rights reserved.

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Articles
  • Podcast
0
0
0
0