• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®

ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®

religious liberty and religious freedom news

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Articles
  • Podcast
Home » Florida Amendment 8: A Trojan Horse That Could Regulate Churches’ Free Speech

Florida Amendment 8: A Trojan Horse That Could Regulate Churches’ Free Speech

October 29, 2012 by Michael Peabody

Florida Amendment 8 - Trojan Horse

Next week, Florida voters will decide on whether to remove language in the Florida State Constitution that bars religious or sectarian institutions from receiving state money. Currently religious organizations are able to use state money for charitable purposes but are barred from using it to spread religious messages.Florida Amendment 8 - Trojan Horse

The ballot measure, termed a “religious freedom” amendment by the state legislature, has caused concern among public educators because of fears could open the door for a voucher system that would allow public money to go to religious schools.  The Florida Supreme Court overturned school vouchers in 2006 but the amendment could open the door to vouchers in the future.

When it comes to public vouchers, public educators are concerned about decreased funding and some religious organizations are concerned about increased regulation of their curriculum by the state. State money to religious institutions does not come without strings attached, and religious organizations that value their autonomy should carefully consider the ramifications of accepting state funds.

There are basic arguments that non-believers should not be forced to support religious messages they disagree with, but the stronger argument in my view comes from the religious side where conservatives should maintain a healthy fear of attempts of government attempts to regulate their hiring practices and speech which often comes attached to financial arrangements.

For instance, tax-exempt status precludes pastors from endorsing political candidates. It is not inconceivable that acceptance of state money could be an avenue for limitation of speech on a variety of moral issues such as same-sex marriage in schools and churches. It is likely that organizations that begin to accept this money will by necessity become more secular over time as state laws against religious discrimination are applied through the pressures of policy, legislation, and litigation.

Florida’s Amendment 8 is being promoted under a guise of “religious freedom,” but accepting state funds will subject religious institutions to increased regulation that would actually restrict free speech.

###

For more information on Florida Amendment 8, including the text of the amendment and arguments for and against Amendment 8, visit CollinsCenter.org.

Filed Under: Action Needed, Current Events, In the News, New, Politics, Religious Accommodation Tagged With: 2012, Amendment 8, election, Free Speech, religious freedom, religious liberty

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Jonathan Peinado says

    October 29, 2012 at 5:55 pm

    thank you for writing this article!

  2. Jim Frankowiak says

    October 30, 2012 at 8:16 am

    Vouchers will continue to be unconstitutional regardless what takes place at the polls November 6. Passage or non-passage of Amendment 8 will not change that statement of fact.

    The focus of the amendment is government funding of social service programs today and tomorrow. Amendment 8 seeks to ensure these crucial social service programs provided by faith-based groups will continue. Recent lawsuits have put them in potential jeopardy and Amendment 8 will remove that jeopardy and allow religious groups to continue to vie for state funding of social service programs as has been the case for decades. Thousands of Floridians rely on these programs each day for health services, substance abuse treatment, housing assistance, food programs and much more.

    Reading more into this amendment than what is stated is totally misleading. The Blaine Amendment is arcane and antiquated. It does not belong in the Florida Constitution. Its removal via passage of Amendment 8 has no effect on the state establishment clause, free exercise clause and public morals clause. It is also subject to the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution so that anything prohibited by the First Amendment is still prohibited under state law. Amendment 8 protects religious freedom simply by restoring the status quo we enjoyed until recently: equal treatment of religious and non-religious persons with respect to government programs.

  3. Andrea Gilbert says

    October 31, 2012 at 2:24 am

    In respose to JF, one thing at a time:

    “Vouchers will continue to be unconstitutional regardless what takes place at the polls November 6. Passage or non-passage of Amendment 8 will not change that statement of fact.”

    They are unconstitutional today because of the Bush v Holmes ruling using Title IX language to strike down Jeb Bush’s voucher plan. Whether or not they remain unconstitutional will be up to the courts. Three of the justices who ruled against vouchers are up for retention and a lot of money has been spent to encourage people to vote against retention.

    In fact, my statement “it will be up to the courts”, is not necessarily true, depending on the outcome of the Nov. 6th election.

    Amendment 5 on the same ballot would allow a simple majority of the legislature to overturn court rulings. Right now they can only do that with a 2/3rds majority vote.

    Considering what the make-up of the next legislature is likely to be, there is a very real possibility that if Amendment 5 passes (irregardless of whether 8 does), voucher unconstitutionality will be challenged and quite possibly overturned.

    Vote NO on 5, but vote NO on 8 also (for more reasons see next post)

  4. Andrea Gilbert says

    October 31, 2012 at 2:37 am

    JF:

    “Amendment 8 seeks to ensure these crucial social service programs provided by faith-based groups will continue. Recent lawsuits have put them in potential jeopardy and Amendment 8 will remove that jeopardy and allow religious groups to continue to vie for state funding of social service programs as has been the case for decades.”

    I cannot find any other lawsuit but one. The particulars of the case include the fact that the two groups were actively ‘preaching doctrine’. As long as a Catholic hospital or charity, or any other religious-affiliated group runs their social service programs like a business (for example, being non-discriminatory in who they hire and who they serve) and not like a church, there is no reason to think the current level of funding will be reduced or eliminated, or that it could not increase, if more funding was available.

    There is simply not nearly enough evidence to suggest these programs are in any real jeopardy, certainly not enough to suggest we must amend our constitution to protect them.

Primary Sidebar

Geneva, Switzerland - December 03, 2019: World Health Organization (WHO / OMS) Headquarters - DepositPhotos.com

Biden admin could hand over US control of health emergencies to WHO next week

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The ultimate control over America’s health care and its national sovereignty will be put up for a vote next week at a meeting of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) governing legislative body, the World Health Assembly (WHA).  On May 22-28, 2022, the 75th World Health Assembly will convene at the United Nations […]

Statement on the Leak in Dobbs

The leak was intended to disrupt the processing of the decision and we are not going to dignify the leak or the unidentified leaker by analyzing it prematurely. As a constitutional republic we cannot go down that road without doing severe damage to the institution of the Supreme Court where there must be professional courtesy between the justices and their staffs.

Boston City Hall - photo from Supreme Court Opinion

Supreme Court rules 9-0 that Boston violated 1st Amendment in refusing Christian flag at City Hall

This morning the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Shurtleff v. Boston (Dec’d 5/2/2022) that the city of Boston violated the free speech rights of a Christian group when it refused to allow them to participate in a city flag raising program.

Active Liberty - a survey of Justice Stephen Breyer's religion clause jurisprudence - Supreme Court

Active Liberty: A Survey of Justice Stephen Breyer’s Religion Clause Decisions

A comprehensive review of retiring Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer’s decisions in Free Exercise and Establishment Clause cases.

Canadian gov’t calculates that expansion of assisted suicide will save taxpayers millions of dollars

In Canada, it is easier for the disabled who do not suffer terminal illness to get approval for assisted suicide than approval for affordable housing. The government has calculated the cost of providing healthcare versus providing assisted suicide.

Random Quote

Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.

— Ronald Reagan

Get the ReligiousLiberty.TV Newsletter!

Comes out a couple of times a month. Unsubscribe anytime automatically, no questions asked.
* = required field
unsubscribe from list

powered by MailChimp!

Copyright © 2022 Founders' First Freedom is a registered trademark. All rights reserved.

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Articles
  • Podcast
0
0
0
0