• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®

ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®

religious liberty and religious freedom news

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Articles
  • Podcast
Home » Guest Opinion: Endless exemptions for faith? Hobby Lobby case not a simple one

Guest Opinion: Endless exemptions for faith? Hobby Lobby case not a simple one

January 7, 2014 by ReligiousLiberty.TV

 

robert ray(This article first appeared in the Orlando Sentinel, December 17, 2013 and is reposted here with the permission of the author)

By Robert J. Ray

When the U.S. Supreme Court decides the case Hobby Lobby v. Sebelius, they’ll need the wisdom of Solomon. Why?

The Affordable Care Act requires large businesses to provide employee health insurance. It’s the law.

Because Hobby Lobby’s owners have religious objections to certain forms of birth control, they contend that they should be exempted from having to bankroll practices they believe are immoral. In a nation committed to freedom of religion, shouldn’t that be their right?

On the other hand …

Hobby Lobby and all of us as individuals are required to pay taxes. And taxes fund the military, which kills people. But there’s no exemption from any taxation requirements for those who don’t want to help bankroll the taking of human life.

No one is forced to personally bear arms in the military. But I repeat, taxpayers aren’t excluded from helping to bankroll the military — despite any moral objections they may have.

Similarly, in the case of the Affordable Care Act, no one is forced to use birth control. But the law says an employer’s insurance must include that option.

Since court decisions set precedents with far-reaching implications, the justices must address both the specific and the big picture. And it’s complicated.

If an evangelical employer is exempted from providing coverage for birth control, what about a Jehovah’s Witness employer who believes that blood transfusions are immoral?

Can an employer whose religion calls for sex only within marriage refuse obstetrics coverage to an unmarried female employee who becomes pregnant?

What about Muslim employers who oppose alcohol consumption? Would they be exempted from covering rehab on sober living hawaii?

Where would these exemptions stop? Realistically, can a government allow every employer to customize the rules without descending into administrative chaos? Justice Antonin Scalia argued in Oregon v. Smith that one’s religious beliefs don’t negate the need to comply with valid laws.

On the other hand, freedom of religion is a crucial principle that must be defended. But how far?

As I said, it’s complicated.

Robert J. Ray, a risk-management consultant, is a member of the executive committee of the Interfaith Council of Central Florida.

 

Filed Under: Current Events, Employment Law, Politics, Privacy, Religion, Religious Accommodation Tagged With: affordable care act, Antonin Scalia, Hobby Lobby, ObamaCare, religious freedom, religious liberty

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Walter McGill says

    February 4, 2014 at 10:25 am

    “It’s the law.” How many times did I hear that line when facing incarceration for obeying my religious conscience!

    The “letter of law” must be applied with the proper balance of the “spirit of law.” Every religious liberty case should be taken on its own unique merits. We live in a complex world, yes. However, as “Christians,” we rightly ask, “What would Jesus do?”

    Regarding the author’s arbitrary example of the potential for income tax exemptions applied to those who possess a “sincere religious belief” against the war machine of America, why not? But, let it be confirmed (tested) by a thorough examination of those declaring that belief. Such a conviction must be practiced without any taint of hypocrisy. Let us “test” Hobby Lobby’s practices on this ground.

    For some reason, I am reminded of the untenable view that churches need trademark protection to keep the “David Koresh cult-leader” types at bay. We can almost always boil these issues down to a “money motive” — the love of which is “the root of all evil.”

Primary Sidebar

Geneva, Switzerland - December 03, 2019: World Health Organization (WHO / OMS) Headquarters - DepositPhotos.com

Biden admin could hand over US control of health emergencies to WHO next week

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The ultimate control over America’s health care and its national sovereignty will be put up for a vote next week at a meeting of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) governing legislative body, the World Health Assembly (WHA).  On May 22-28, 2022, the 75th World Health Assembly will convene at the United Nations […]

Statement on the Leak in Dobbs

The leak was intended to disrupt the processing of the decision and we are not going to dignify the leak or the unidentified leaker by analyzing it prematurely. As a constitutional republic we cannot go down that road without doing severe damage to the institution of the Supreme Court where there must be professional courtesy between the justices and their staffs.

Boston City Hall - photo from Supreme Court Opinion

Supreme Court rules 9-0 that Boston violated 1st Amendment in refusing Christian flag at City Hall

This morning the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Shurtleff v. Boston (Dec’d 5/2/2022) that the city of Boston violated the free speech rights of a Christian group when it refused to allow them to participate in a city flag raising program.

Active Liberty - a survey of Justice Stephen Breyer's religion clause jurisprudence - Supreme Court

Active Liberty: A Survey of Justice Stephen Breyer’s Religion Clause Decisions

A comprehensive review of retiring Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer’s decisions in Free Exercise and Establishment Clause cases.

Canadian gov’t calculates that expansion of assisted suicide will save taxpayers millions of dollars

In Canada, it is easier for the disabled who do not suffer terminal illness to get approval for assisted suicide than approval for affordable housing. The government has calculated the cost of providing healthcare versus providing assisted suicide.

Random Quote

I don’t know that the United States is ‘God’s Country,’ but the church has been so strong here, and because of its influence, we hold life to be sacred and we believe that individuals have dignity. This is part of our legacy.

— Rich Mullins

Get the ReligiousLiberty.TV Newsletter!

Comes out a couple of times a month. Unsubscribe anytime automatically, no questions asked.
* = required field
unsubscribe from list

powered by MailChimp!

Copyright © 2022 Founders' First Freedom is a registered trademark. All rights reserved.

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Articles
  • Podcast
0
0
0
0