• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®

ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®

religious liberty and religious freedom news

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Articles
  • Podcast
Home » Liberty Institute Files EEOC Charge of Discrimination on Behalf of Dr. Eric Walsh

Liberty Institute Files EEOC Charge of Discrimination on Behalf of Dr. Eric Walsh

September 29, 2014 by ReligiousLiberty.TV


Liberty Institute and the law firm of Parks, Chesin & Walbert have filed a discrimination charge against the Georgia Department of Health with the EEOC on behalf of Dr. Eric Walsh who was denied employment due to his expression of his religious beliefs.  The following press release was issued September 23, 2014 by Liberty Institute. Liberty Institute is a non-denominational organization that bills itself as “the nation’s largest legal organization exclusively dedicated to defending religious liberty in America.”   The Georgia Department of Health has indicated that it will be responding to the charges shortly.  We will be following the progress of this case as it proceeds.

Press Release – Eric Walsh Liberty Institute

ATLANTA, GA, September 23, 2014-Today, Liberty Institute and Parks, Chesin & Walbert, attorneys for Dr. Eric Walsh, a leading public health expert, who holds both a medical degree and Ph.D. and serves as lay minister with the Seventh Day Adventist Church, filed an official charge of discrimination with the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Georgia Department of Health offered Dr. Walsh a job in May, which he accepted, announced his employment publicly, but then top officials laughed about their decision to terminate his position as Director of Public Health for the region of northeast Georgia based upon Dr. Walsh’s religious beliefs. Listen to the voicemail here: https://libertyinstitute.org/walsh#voicemail.

 

“No one should be fired for simply expressing his religious beliefs,” said Andrew Coffman, partner in the law firm of Parks, Chesin & Walbert and a Liberty Institute volunteer attorney.  “In America, it is against the law to fire an employee for expressing his religious beliefs-especially when that expression takes place at church.  This kind of religious intolerance by an employer has no place in today’s workforce.”

 

Dr. Walsh, among the first of his family to go to college, was eminently qualified to lead the Georgia Department of Health, but has now been effectively blacklisted by the Georgia Department of Health because of religious messages he gave as a lay minister.  According to the Charge of Discrimination filed today with the EEOC, Dr. Walsh was the focus of California activists, dissatisfied with his selection as a speaker at the graduation ceremony for Pasadena City College.  A mean-spirited campaign that intentionally twisted Dr. Walsh’s religious beliefs ultimately resulted in his forced resignation as the Director of Public Health for the City of Pasadena.

 

“This kind of intolerance has no place in today’s workforce,” stated Jeremy Dys, Senior Counsel for Liberty Institute.   “People of faith ought to be respected at work, not fired for expressing their religious beliefs at church.”

 

A copy of Dr. Walsh’s EEOC complaint, the statement in support of his charge of discrimination, and other information, including a picture of Dr. Walsh, is available at https://libertyinstitute.org/walsh
The EEOC will now begin an independent investigation of Dr. Walsh’s charges of religious discrimination and retaliation.  Should the EEOC agree that the Georgia Department of Health is guilty of religious discrimination, it may order broad relief, including back pay, front pay, and other significant damages for the unlawful conduct of Dr. Walsh’s one-time employer.

###

 

 

Filed Under: Current Events Tagged With: @advanceliberty, Adventist, eeoc, Eric Walsh, freedom of speech, Liberty Institute, religious discrimination, religious freedom, religious liberty, workplace religious freedom

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Janette 152855 says

    October 15, 2014 at 6:05 pm

    Dr. Eric Walsh is certainly qualified for the Director of Public Health position, so I don’t see why he was fired for “expressing his religious beliefs.” The first amendment in the Bill of Rights clearly says that every citizen has the right to believe in any religion they desire, so why should employers be allowed to fire someone based on their personal religious beliefs. If the national government cannot interfere with these civil liberties, employers should definitely not interfere with them. America uses the system of meritocracy, meaning that those that are qualified are hired. Moreover, Dr. Walsh was not imposing or preaching his religion, so he should not be fired.

    • sarahi says

      October 15, 2014 at 8:46 pm

      I agree with this. Freedom of religion is a 1st amendment right that all people have in the United States. Dr.Walsh should be able to openly express his religious beliefs, especially because he is a minister, without it affecting his possible working position.

  2. Bryan Flores says

    October 19, 2014 at 10:53 pm

    It is shocking to see that even in a highly renowned state governmental institute there could be discrimination. Dr. Walsh is qualified to hold that position and there should not be any other factor contributing to his employment. If he is qualified he deserves to hold that position. In accordance with the 1st amendment it is illegal for any type of institution to discriminate against an individual because of their religion. The free exercise clause protects individuals from religious persecution and as such Dr. Walsh has had his rights infringed upon and should be compensated for this injustice.

    • Art says

      October 26, 2014 at 7:39 pm

      i agree on this statement because i believe it is held in within ones right to believe what they want and should be protected under the 1st amendment.

  3. Art says

    October 26, 2014 at 7:28 pm

    Dr.Walash is entilted to religious freedom and his expression according to the 1st amendment stated by my fellow student Bryan i believe that this is a protected right and that discrimnation should be unheld based on individual and theier view on religion. Dr.Walsh was in no way preaching or go against other religions and should attain to his job. This is a way of seeing a social injustice to America and to the free exercise clause in protection of religious freedom.

Primary Sidebar

Geneva, Switzerland - December 03, 2019: World Health Organization (WHO / OMS) Headquarters - DepositPhotos.com

Biden admin could hand over US control of health emergencies to WHO next week

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The ultimate control over America’s health care and its national sovereignty will be put up for a vote next week at a meeting of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) governing legislative body, the World Health Assembly (WHA).  On May 22-28, 2022, the 75th World Health Assembly will convene at the United Nations […]

Statement on the Leak in Dobbs

The leak was intended to disrupt the processing of the decision and we are not going to dignify the leak or the unidentified leaker by analyzing it prematurely. As a constitutional republic we cannot go down that road without doing severe damage to the institution of the Supreme Court where there must be professional courtesy between the justices and their staffs.

Boston City Hall - photo from Supreme Court Opinion

Supreme Court rules 9-0 that Boston violated 1st Amendment in refusing Christian flag at City Hall

This morning the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Shurtleff v. Boston (Dec’d 5/2/2022) that the city of Boston violated the free speech rights of a Christian group when it refused to allow them to participate in a city flag raising program.

Active Liberty - a survey of Justice Stephen Breyer's religion clause jurisprudence - Supreme Court

Active Liberty: A Survey of Justice Stephen Breyer’s Religion Clause Decisions

A comprehensive review of retiring Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer’s decisions in Free Exercise and Establishment Clause cases.

Canadian gov’t calculates that expansion of assisted suicide will save taxpayers millions of dollars

In Canada, it is easier for the disabled who do not suffer terminal illness to get approval for assisted suicide than approval for affordable housing. The government has calculated the cost of providing healthcare versus providing assisted suicide.

Random Quote

I have sworn on the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.

— Thomas Jefferson

Get the ReligiousLiberty.TV Newsletter!

Comes out a couple of times a month. Unsubscribe anytime automatically, no questions asked.
* = required field
unsubscribe from list

powered by MailChimp!

Copyright © 2022 Founders' First Freedom is a registered trademark. All rights reserved.

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Articles
  • Podcast
0
0
0
0