• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®

ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®

religious liberty and religious freedom news

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Articles
  • Podcast
Home » VIDEO: Proselytism and Religion – A Hindu Perspective

VIDEO: Proselytism and Religion – A Hindu Perspective

June 21, 2008 by ReligiousLiberty.TV

At ReligiousLiberty.TV, we feature information from a wide variety of perspectives.  A posting on this site does not indicate endorsement of the views presented, but rather presents it with the intent to discuss and learn.

This is a set of 2 video clips from a Hindu perspective that discusses the attempts of Christians to evangelize non-Christians in India.  Are Christians engaging in sincere evangelism or opportunistic exploitation as the video producers claim? Is conversion being unfairly used as a price to pay in order to receive missionary aid?

The video also proposed a “Code of Ethics” for religious conversion which includes language that it should be the result of true spiritual change, not manipulation or coercion. This is likely to increasingly become a larger issue in a global economy and information society.  As this issue grows, churches will need re-evaluate their methods of spreading the gospel and seriously consider how they are being perceived in order to avoid sweeping attempts to ban all forms of proselytism.

If you have experience in this issue, please share!

Filed Under: Human Rights, International, Video Tagged With: Christianity, evangelism, Hinduism, India, Video

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. rlbolton says

    June 23, 2008 at 4:06 am

    The clips were interesting. It was good to see the Hindu perspective. I had heard the accusations leveled at Christians before, but didn’t consider their perceptions accurate, I just thought they were unhappy with people’s change. They seem to have a point in some situations. People should always have the power to choose their religion. Certainly accepting relief efforts, for instance, should never obligate a person to convert.

    On the other hand, a person who undergoes a spiritual and intellectual change in perspective should be allowed to convert. I think their weakest argument is forbidding conversion in the course of education, even for children. Education is a very effective way to bring change. But again, it must be a result of a spiritual and intellectual change, and not in any way coercive. There should be no expectation of conversion in exchange for education. It would have to be a by-product of learning more, representing a change in the person’s perspective, not a commodity exchange, nor based on manipulation, or indoctrination. But here it gets a little fuzzy… because sometimes people who dislike someone else’s conversion think it is one of these, when it is really a spiritual and intellectual change in the person’s perspective.

    Much to think about…

    RBolton

  2. rlbolton says

    June 22, 2008 at 9:06 pm

    The clips were interesting. It was good to see the Hindu perspective. I had heard the accusations leveled at Christians before, but didn’t consider their perceptions accurate, I just thought they were unhappy with people’s change. They seem to have a point in some situations. People should always have the power to choose their religion. Certainly accepting relief efforts, for instance, should never obligate a person to convert.

    On the other hand, a person who undergoes a spiritual and intellectual change in perspective should be allowed to convert. I think their weakest argument is forbidding conversion in the course of education, even for children. Education is a very effective way to bring change. But again, it must be a result of a spiritual and intellectual change, and not in any way coercive. There should be no expectation of conversion in exchange for education. It would have to be a by-product of learning more, representing a change in the person’s perspective, not a commodity exchange, nor based on manipulation, or indoctrination. But here it gets a little fuzzy… because sometimes people who dislike someone else’s conversion think it is one of these, when it is really a spiritual and intellectual change in the person’s perspective.

    Much to think about…

    RBolton

  3. Alison Agins says

    June 24, 2008 at 3:56 am

    It is interesting.
    I took a look at Hindu Times and I also see an agenda there. I remember looking at it a few years ago.

    About what was said regarding the methods that Christians have used to try to convert Hindus as well as other religions. I was reminded of what I had recently read about Navajos and other American First Peoples here and in Canada. For that matter in South America too. How the Christians would remove the children from their parents and put them in schools where the children were in many cases were abused. This has happened all over the world when you think about it. China, Australia and the South Pacific.

    When you look at what has been done to convert the “natives” it really can make you feel ashamed. What has been done in the name of Christ!

    And yet, there it is a command. “Go you unto all the world”. But, he followed it up with how to do it. And then we have the examples of the disciples and Paul. There never was force, or any sort of underhanded ways.

    I’m hoping that our missions are always making sure that those that are in the field are there with hearts full of love and good intentions and do not operate with a paternal attitude towards those that they are there to bring to Christ.

    And when needs arise it is often the Christians that are there first to help. Some my have motives other than bringing help to the suffering, but one has to really wonder why the majority of help is coming from Christians.

  4. Alison Agins says

    June 23, 2008 at 8:56 pm

    It is interesting.
    I took a look at Hindu Times and I also see an agenda there. I remember looking at it a few years ago.

    About what was said regarding the methods that Christians have used to try to convert Hindus as well as other religions. I was reminded of what I had recently read about Navajos and other American First Peoples here and in Canada. For that matter in South America too. How the Christians would remove the children from their parents and put them in schools where the children were in many cases were abused. This has happened all over the world when you think about it. China, Australia and the South Pacific.

    When you look at what has been done to convert the “natives” it really can make you feel ashamed. What has been done in the name of Christ!

    And yet, there it is a command. “Go you unto all the world”. But, he followed it up with how to do it. And then we have the examples of the disciples and Paul. There never was force, or any sort of underhanded ways.

    I’m hoping that our missions are always making sure that those that are in the field are there with hearts full of love and good intentions and do not operate with a paternal attitude towards those that they are there to bring to Christ.

    And when needs arise it is often the Christians that are there first to help. Some my have motives other than bringing help to the suffering, but one has to really wonder why the majority of help is coming from Christians.

Primary Sidebar

Geneva, Switzerland - December 03, 2019: World Health Organization (WHO / OMS) Headquarters - DepositPhotos.com

Biden admin could hand over US control of health emergencies to WHO next week

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The ultimate control over America’s health care and its national sovereignty will be put up for a vote next week at a meeting of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) governing legislative body, the World Health Assembly (WHA).  On May 22-28, 2022, the 75th World Health Assembly will convene at the United Nations […]

Statement on the Leak in Dobbs

The leak was intended to disrupt the processing of the decision and we are not going to dignify the leak or the unidentified leaker by analyzing it prematurely. As a constitutional republic we cannot go down that road without doing severe damage to the institution of the Supreme Court where there must be professional courtesy between the justices and their staffs.

Boston City Hall - photo from Supreme Court Opinion

Supreme Court rules 9-0 that Boston violated 1st Amendment in refusing Christian flag at City Hall

This morning the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Shurtleff v. Boston (Dec’d 5/2/2022) that the city of Boston violated the free speech rights of a Christian group when it refused to allow them to participate in a city flag raising program.

Active Liberty - a survey of Justice Stephen Breyer's religion clause jurisprudence - Supreme Court

Active Liberty: A Survey of Justice Stephen Breyer’s Religion Clause Decisions

A comprehensive review of retiring Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer’s decisions in Free Exercise and Establishment Clause cases.

Canadian gov’t calculates that expansion of assisted suicide will save taxpayers millions of dollars

In Canada, it is easier for the disabled who do not suffer terminal illness to get approval for assisted suicide than approval for affordable housing. The government has calculated the cost of providing healthcare versus providing assisted suicide.

Random Quote

But let justice run down like water, And righteousness like a mighty stream.

— Amos 5:24

Get the ReligiousLiberty.TV Newsletter!

Comes out a couple of times a month. Unsubscribe anytime automatically, no questions asked.
* = required field
unsubscribe from list

powered by MailChimp!

Copyright © 2022 Founders' First Freedom is a registered trademark. All rights reserved.

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Articles
  • Podcast
0
0
0
0