• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®

ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®

religious liberty and religious freedom news

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Articles
  • Podcast
Home » When Legislation Fails, Gov Jindal Orders ‘Protection of Conscience’

When Legislation Fails, Gov Jindal Orders ‘Protection of Conscience’

June 25, 2015 by ReligiousLiberty.TV

Gov. Bobby Jindal
Gov. Bobby Jindal

When the Louisiana state legislature failed to pass the “Marriage and Conscience Act” (HB 707)  earlier this year, on May 19, Governor Bobby Jindal issued an executive order  that will accomplish the same goal.  HB 707 provided that the state of Louisiana could take no “adverse action against a person, wholly or partially, on the basis that such person acts in accordance with a religious belief or moral conviction about the institution of marriage.”

The bill defined “adverse action” as denying tax exemptions, disallowing charitable deductions, disqualifying employee benefit plans, exclusion from state licenses, loans, certifications, or withholding any state benefits, or any other kind of discrimination on the basis of the person’s belief or conviction about marriage.

The bill would have mirrored at the state level the First Amendment Defense Act (S. 1598 and H.R. 2802) which is currently pending in both houses of the U.S. Congress.

Jindal’s executive order cites the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby (2014) as well as Louisiana law to establish that the definition of “person” includes both individuals and for-profit and non-profit corporations.

Jindal’s order indicated that the state and its agencies “shall take no adverse action” against those who have a religious belief that marriage is between one man and one woman

“A.       Deny or revoke an exemption from taxation pursuant to La. R.S. 47:287.501 of the person who is acting in accordance with his religious belief.
B.       Disallow a deduction for state tax purposes of any charitable contribution made to or by such person.
C.       Deny or exclude such person from receiving any state grant, contract, cooperative agreement, loan, professional license, certification, accreditation, employment, or other similar position or status.
D.       Deny or withhold from such person any benefit under a state benefit program.
E.       Deny, revoke, or suspend the accreditation, licensing, or certification of any person that would be accredited, licensed, or certified for purposes of Louisiana law but-for a determination against such person on the basis that the person acts in accordance with his own religious belief.”

The order became effective immediately. According to Jindal, the issue was not discrimination, but rather to protect the First Amendment rights of the citizens of the state.

Opponents to the order have argued that it is unenforceable under Louisiana law which prohibits a governor from creating substantive law. Those who favor the order argue that it simply creates a policy that the executive branch will follow.

###

The Executive Order is available here: http://www.gov.state.la.us/assets/docs/BJ%202015-%208%20%20Marriage%20and%20Conscience%20Order.pdf

Filed Under: Discrimination, Marriage, Religious Institutions, Supreme Court

Primary Sidebar

Geneva, Switzerland - December 03, 2019: World Health Organization (WHO / OMS) Headquarters - DepositPhotos.com

Biden admin could hand over US control of health emergencies to WHO next week

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The ultimate control over America’s health care and its national sovereignty will be put up for a vote next week at a meeting of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) governing legislative body, the World Health Assembly (WHA).  On May 22-28, 2022, the 75th World Health Assembly will convene at the United Nations […]

Statement on the Leak in Dobbs

The leak was intended to disrupt the processing of the decision and we are not going to dignify the leak or the unidentified leaker by analyzing it prematurely. As a constitutional republic we cannot go down that road without doing severe damage to the institution of the Supreme Court where there must be professional courtesy between the justices and their staffs.

Boston City Hall - photo from Supreme Court Opinion

Supreme Court rules 9-0 that Boston violated 1st Amendment in refusing Christian flag at City Hall

This morning the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Shurtleff v. Boston (Dec’d 5/2/2022) that the city of Boston violated the free speech rights of a Christian group when it refused to allow them to participate in a city flag raising program.

Active Liberty - a survey of Justice Stephen Breyer's religion clause jurisprudence - Supreme Court

Active Liberty: A Survey of Justice Stephen Breyer’s Religion Clause Decisions

A comprehensive review of retiring Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer’s decisions in Free Exercise and Establishment Clause cases.

Canadian gov’t calculates that expansion of assisted suicide will save taxpayers millions of dollars

In Canada, it is easier for the disabled who do not suffer terminal illness to get approval for assisted suicide than approval for affordable housing. The government has calculated the cost of providing healthcare versus providing assisted suicide.

Random Quote

We ought to obey God rather than men.

— Acts 5:29

Get the ReligiousLiberty.TV Newsletter!

Comes out a couple of times a month. Unsubscribe anytime automatically, no questions asked.
* = required field
unsubscribe from list

powered by MailChimp!

Copyright © 2022 Founders' First Freedom is a registered trademark. All rights reserved.

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Articles
  • Podcast
0
0
0
0