ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®  – News and Updates on Religious Liberty and Freedom
Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Church and State
  • In the News
  • In the News
  • Supreme Court
  • Free Speech
  • Legislation
Menu

ACLU Sues to Block West Virginia Governor’s Vaccine Exemption Order

Posted on May 24, 2025 by ReligiousLiberty.TV

On May 23, 2025, the American Civil Liberties Union of West Virginia and Mountain State Justice filed a lawsuit in Kanawha County Circuit Court challenging Governor Patrick Morrisey’s executive order permitting religious and philosophical exemptions to school vaccination requirements. The exemptions apply to vaccines currently mandated for school attendance in West Virginia, including those for measles, mumps, rubella, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, hepatitis B, and varicella (chickenpox).

The plaintiffs, two parents of immunocompromised children, argue that the governor overstepped his authority by unilaterally changing public health policy. “Governors do not rule by decree,” said ACLU-WV Legal Director Aubrey Sparks. “At the center of this lawsuit is who gets to make these decisions for our students. On this question, the state Constitution is clear that the authority lies with the Legislature, not the governor” (acluwv.org).

Governor Morrisey’s January 2025 executive order instructed the West Virginia Department of Health to begin recognizing religious and philosophical exemptions under the 2023 Equal Protection for Religion Act, which prohibits the government from “substantially burdening” religious freedom unless it proves a “compelling interest.” Previously, West Virginia had one of the strictest vaccine mandates in the nation, allowing only medical exemptions to school immunization requirements.

The lawsuit does not challenge the legitimacy of religious beliefs but focuses instead on the process through which vaccine policy is established. The legal complaint emphasizes that the state Legislature—not the executive branch—has the constitutional authority to make such changes. In March 2025, the House of Delegates rejected Senate Bill 460, which would have legislatively established the same religious and philosophical exemptions now being enforced by the governor’s order (newsandsentinel.com).

Judge Kenneth Ballard of the Kanawha County Circuit Court has been assigned to the case. A hearing date has not yet been announced.


Another Take:

The ACLU suing over religious vaccine exemptions is like seeing a lifeguard sprint across the beach—not because someone’s drowning, but because someone brought a cross-shaped beach towel. Sure, the lawsuit’s officially about executive authority, but let’s not kid ourselves—the ACLU tends to treat religion the way a vampire treats garlic. They’ll defend your right to burn a flag, but start talking about faith in public policy and suddenly it’s all “compelling interest” and “substantial burden” like they’re trying to evict Moses from the courthouse steps.

Vaccines aren’t a religious issue in most traditions—no major faith bans them—but when parents claim a faith-based exemption, it lights up the ACLU radar faster than a nativity scene on government property. It’s not that they’re anti-religion, exactly—they’re just really, really picky about when and where it’s allowed to exist.

Category: Current Events

1 thought on “ACLU Sues to Block West Virginia Governor’s Vaccine Exemption Order”

  1. Dave and Sandi Reynolds says:
    May 25, 2025 at 1:58 am

    It seems to me that you are being too harsh on the ACLU. I have seen many times the ACLU has defended religious people and their rights. This case looks to me more like a case where parents with immunocompromised children would like the law to stay the same. If it is also true that West Virginia law gives this power to the Legislature and not the Governor, and the Legislature rejected the same exemption in March of this year, then it is an overreach by the Governor, similar to what more than one President has done in the recent past, when they don’t get what they want out of the Legislative branch. Some overreaches are clearly attacks on the Constitution. It will be interesting to see how the Court rules on this. There are strong public health reasons to oppose what the Governor has done. We know that when herd immunity drops below 95% the risk to the unvaccinated and the immunocompromised starts escalating quickly. Look at the recent measles outbreak. That places those immunocompromised children at risk and I can see why their parents would want to find an avenue to attack this. They are also probably, because of medical bills, unable to afford to take on a case like this out of their own pockets, so that leaves them few choices, and the ACLU has been willing to take on cases that have some merit but the people needing the help, can’t afford to do it themselves.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

©2025 ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom® – News and Updates on Religious Liberty and Freedom
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experience, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}