By Rajmund (Ray) Dabrowski –
Authentic religion calls for a respect, sensitivity and acceptance of another’s beliefs and practices. Do unto others … the saying goes.
It really did not matter which one of the muezzins woke me up. The melodic reciting of a call to prayer from one of the minarets at 4:45 in the morning on the next to last day of the Holy Month of Ramadan could have come from any of the mosques surrounding the Holiday Inn hotel in the Western part of Amman, Jordan.
Soon, I was asleep again, even though it seemed that the call to prayer was endless. It was still before sunrise, and why was he doing it at such an ungodly hour, I was asking the little man in my head.
Waking up an hour or so later, my head gave-in to a bit of an early morning reflection. Just like with any other varieties of life, cultivating an approach of have open mind allows acceptance of diversity. That’s what I like to experience in my global village.
So, sleeping and dreaming will come soon enough, I said aloud to myself.
As a participant of a consultation on “Teaching Respect for Religion” my Amman experience was a valuable lesson. My own lesson. The hosts – The Arab Bridge Centre for Human Rights and Development – did not have to argue how tolerant the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan is. After all, churches and mosques frequently coexist next to each other with only a fence providing a gentle reminder of diversity. What matters is that being a Jordanian yields respect, even acceptance, for your brother’s or sister’s religion.
A few phrases from the Meeting of Experts of the International Association of Religious Liberty (IRLA) stand out in my mind – I say ‘no’ to tolerance. Instead, I call for ‘mutual acceptance’ – Hasan Abu Nimah, former Ambassador of Jordan to the United Nations; We are all in a global classroom and a part of education for good or for bad – Dr. Gunnar Stalsett, Bishop Emeritus of Oslo, and vice chairman of the Norwegian Peace Prize Committee; In America, we have an incomplete view of religious liberty – Mitch Tyner, Esq, from IRLA.
The Amman conversation spoke plainly about what makes or breaks social harmony. Without a decisive practice in the realm of commonly held values in all and any milieu, we will not halt the effect of an erosion of such values, irrespective of a religious tradition that guards them.
The current European experiment with social interaction and freedom in the midst of secularism does not bid well for the nurture that Christian tradition seems to claim for itself. When the human person,and his or her dignity, ceases to be at the center of human interaction, the loser is always the humanity itself.
Is there is a room for an option that would allow respect to be a circumvented by some other lofty ideal? Respect should always walk hand-in-hand with the acceptance of one’s identity and the professed truth. Authentic religion calls for a respect, sensitivity and acceptance of another’s beliefs and practices. Do unto others … the saying goes.
Last week, there was a moment when all participants of the Amman conversation were feeling the effect of a call by an obscure Pentecostal clergyman in Florida to burn the Koran. It was a media-driven stunt to be held. Such an expression of hatred and intolerance could have unleashed an avalanche of violent repercussions across the globe, who knows.
But, rhetoric of hatred and an atmosphere of fear is not what creates peace and respect. Thus, the Amman exchange of views and expression of shared values was timely, to say the least.
As I listened to muezzin calling the faithful to pray according to an Islamic tradition, I thought that such a “wake up call” was actually timely. For myself. I was called to respect a religious moment of my brothers and sisters in Jordan.
Was this a private lesson in tolerance, in spite of the ungodly morning hour?
###
Dabrowski should have defined what he means by respect another man’s religion.
Religious Liberty does not mean “I believe one religion is just as good as another”. It is not a sanctuary where all beliefs can gather and become friends. It does not mean that another religion must only teach what is pleasing to another man’s religion. It means the freedom to search for the truth about God and to point out what one believes is a lie about God. The government’s role is to protect from violence those who speak their conscience.
Dabrowski should have defined what he means by respect another man’s religion.
Religious Liberty does not mean “I believe one religion is just as good as another”. It is not a sanctuary where all beliefs can gather and become friends. It does not mean that another religion must only teach what is pleasing to another man’s religion. It means the freedom to search for the truth about God and to point out what one believes is a lie about God. The government’s role is to protect from violence those who speak their conscience.