June 2014

Opinion on the Hobby Lobby Decision: More Equal Than Others

2 Comments / By / / 6 minutes of reading

By Jason Hines – Today the Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision that Hobby Lobby and other closely held corporations can refuse to cover certain forms of contraception in the insurance plans they provide to employees because of their “religious beliefs.” Now I put religious beliefs in quotes because despite the Court’s decision, I refuse to admit that corporations, created in order to separate themselves from the people who create them, can have religious beliefs.

Opinion on the Hobby Lobby Decision: More Equal Than Others Read More »

Supreme Court Rules Closely-Held Corporations Have Religious Rights

1 Comment / By / / 6 minutes of reading

Most business owners set up corporations as legal alter-egos to avoid being held personally responsible if their businesses get sued, but in this case, the employers (in Hobby Lobby, Conestoga Wood, and Mardel) are saying that their corporations can still manifest the owners’ religious beliefs even if it comes at the potential expense of their employees. The Supreme Court agrees.

Supreme Court Rules Closely-Held Corporations Have Religious Rights Read More »

U.S. Supreme Court Affirms Right to Pro-Life Political Speech

By / / 2 minutes of reading

On June 16, 2014 the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in the much-anticipated case, Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus. Justice Thomas delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court finding in favor of the Pro-Life group, Susan B. Anthony List (SBA). The court ruled that SBA and co-petitioner COAST (Coalition Opposed to Additional Spending and Taxes) have standing to challenge an Ohio election statute under which they had been threatened with prosecution for holding members of Congress responsible for their voting record.

U.S. Supreme Court Affirms Right to Pro-Life Political Speech Read More »

Scroll to Top