ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®  – News and Updates on Religious Liberty and Freedom
Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Church and State
  • In the News
  • In the News
  • Supreme Court
  • Free Speech
  • Legislation
Menu

Washington State – Faith-based groups taking crucial role in Euthanasia initiative battle

Posted on October 13, 2008October 13, 2008 by ReligiousLiberty.TV

 

It is compassionate or controlling, a choice or a conspiracy.

On their respective Web sites, the campaigns for and against Initiative
1000 include point-by-point attempts to debunk the other side in the
debate over physician-assisted suicide, the contentious end-of-life
issue facing Washington voters in the general election.

Most of the arguments relate to the adequacy of safeguards in the
measure, which would allow physicians to prescribe lethal doses of
medication if requested by terminally ill patients.

But after dealing with coercion, mental illness, insurance companies,
family notification, physician oaths and other matters, both sides end
their lists by addressing religion.

To contend that giving a terminally ill patient more control over the
dying process is "playing God" -- or is "against God's will" -- is
simply a myth, says Yes on 1000, which prefers to call the initiative
"death with dignity."

The Coalition Against Assisted Suicide disputes the assertion of
supporters that the "only real opposition comes from religious groups."

Still, faith-based groups or individuals are playing a crucial role on
both sides of the battle to make Washington the second state, after
Oregon, to allow physicians to legally prescribe deadly medication --
hardly surprising, since the issue deals with literal matters of life
and death.
Read more at http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/383018_suicidefaith13.html
Category: Current Events, Human Life, Human Rights, Politics, Religion, Top Story

4 thoughts on “Washington State – Faith-based groups taking crucial role in Euthanasia initiative battle”

  1. Kevin James says:
    October 15, 2008 at 12:02 pm

    It’s not surprising that religious groups are the opposition. Religion, good religion, is a promoter of life and the high view of human dignity. It is understandable as to why church groups in America,namely those from the Judeo-Christian faith, would fight against the bill. The whole question of doctor assisted suicide is a wrenching one.

    Oregon has shown that such a law over is decade old existence has not produced mass death to the terminally ill. The majority of those that choose doctor assisted death and are cleared for it, don’t even use it. What studies have shown is that it is an issue of personal dignity and control over one’s end of days that is really a driving force behind this measure.

    It would be most interesting to hear of what faith or non faith a person who chooses assisted suicide and follows through with it and how active they were in their belief. That could shed a whole new dimension on the current debate.

    Truely assisted suicide has its potential problems and it must continue to be debated, reviewed and strickly managed so that a person’s final wishes are indeed honored as best as can be within the law and ethics. The argument is over dignity and how best to preserve and promote it. May both sides of the issue preserve that in their fight for or against the measure.

  2. Kevin James says:
    October 15, 2008 at 5:02 am

    It’s not surprising that religious groups are the opposition. Religion, good religion, is a promoter of life and the high view of human dignity. It is understandable as to why church groups in America,namely those from the Judeo-Christian faith, would fight against the bill. The whole question of doctor assisted suicide is a wrenching one.

    Oregon has shown that such a law over is decade old existence has not produced mass death to the terminally ill. The majority of those that choose doctor assisted death and are cleared for it, don’t even use it. What studies have shown is that it is an issue of personal dignity and control over one’s end of days that is really a driving force behind this measure.

    It would be most interesting to hear of what faith or non faith a person who chooses assisted suicide and follows through with it and how active they were in their belief. That could shed a whole new dimension on the current debate.

    Truely assisted suicide has its potential problems and it must continue to be debated, reviewed and strickly managed so that a person’s final wishes are indeed honored as best as can be within the law and ethics. The argument is over dignity and how best to preserve and promote it. May both sides of the issue preserve that in their fight for or against the measure.

  3. albert michael lapoint says:
    October 18, 2008 at 1:08 am

    just the beginning of the morals
    breakdown in America. sadly this
    will escalate as americans standard of living drops.

  4. albert michael lapoint says:
    October 17, 2008 at 6:08 pm

    just the beginning of the morals
    breakdown in America. sadly this
    will escalate as americans standard of living drops.

Comments are closed.

©2025 ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom® – News and Updates on Religious Liberty and Freedom
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experience, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}