Menu
ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Articles
ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®
DepositPhotos - Disinformation Governance Board

Biden admin announces “Disinformation Governance Board”

Posted on April 30, 2022April 30, 2022 by ReligiousLiberty.TV

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. – First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution

On April 27, 2022, two days after Elon Musk announced his plan to purchase 100% of Twitter, the Biden administration announced the formation of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security “Disinformation Governance Board.”

Speaking of Musk’s effort to acquire Twitter, the Board’s head, Nina Jankowicz, said in an interview with NPR, “I shudder to think about if free speech absolutists were taking over more platforms, what that would look like for marginalized communities.”

Understandably, detractors immediately compared the ominous-sounding “Disinformation Governance Board” to George Orwell’s “Ministry of Truth” in his fictional yet predictive book, 1984. The book’s protagonist, Winston, works for the Ministry of Truth. His job is to modify historic documents to reflect the government in the best light and destroy anything that would prove that the government has said anything false. The Ministry is also involved in creating the “Newspeak” language that would make it difficult to express dissent without running afoul of social conventions.

The name “Disinformation Governance Board” brings to mind a government program that would determine what speech and topics can be expressed online and what is prohibited. According to the DHS, the Board will “protect privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties,” but it is not clear how that will work if freedom of speech is censored or limited. Despite the announcement, perhaps rushed out because of the Musk Twitter announcement, the government has not given clear information about how it will operate. We don’t know even know how the Department of Homeland Security defines the “disinformation” it intends to stop.

It is hard to believe that those who communicate information that violates the official narrative will find DHS officers on their doorstep. Still, the Board may encourage private communication companies to limit their speech. So far, it has worked with major providers, including Facebook and pre-Musk Twitter. Whenever people complained that their social media companies violated their freedom of speech, censors argued that “these are private forums, not government actors.” But as the government continues to pull the strings by asking private companies to curtail freedom of speech, that does not otherwise violate obscenity and existing criminal laws, it increasingly becomes an actor in unconstitutionally curtailing freedom of speech.

Tweets by RelLibertyTV

Recent Posts

  • Learn About US Government and Liberty of Conscience in the Nation's Capitol: New Course for Adventist High School Students Gives College Credit

    Learn About US Government and Liberty of Conscience in the Nation's Capitol: New Course for Adventist High School Students Gives College Credit

    March 28, 2023
  • Founders’ First Freedom files Amicus Brief in US Supreme Court in Support of Workplace Religious Freedom

    Founders’ First Freedom files Amicus Brief in US Supreme Court in Support of Workplace Religious Freedom

    March 26, 2023
  • U.S. District Court Dismisses Hunter v. US Dept of Education Lawsuit

    U.S. District Court Dismisses Hunter v. US Dept of Education Lawsuit

    February 5, 2023
  • Colorado Court: Baker Must Provide "Non-Expressive" Cake to Transgender Customer

    Colorado Court: Baker Must Provide "Non-Expressive" Cake to Transgender Customer

    January 30, 2023
  • Supreme Court to Hear Christian Postal Employee Religious Discrimination Claim - Groff v. DeJoy

    Supreme Court to Hear Christian Postal Employee Religious Discrimination Claim - Groff v. DeJoy

    January 13, 2023

We are not a law firm, do not provide any legal services, legal advice or “lawyer referral services” and do not provide or participate in any legal representation.

©2023 ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom® | WordPress Theme by Superb Themes
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experience, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}