Current Events

Michigan Appeals Court Upholds Convictions of Abortion Protesters for Resisting Arrest and Trespassing

By |

The Michigan Court of Appeals upheld the convictions of four anti-abortion protesters for resisting arrest, disturbing the peace, and trespassing at the Women’s Health Clinic in Flint. The defendants, who staged a “red rose rescue” protest, argued their actions were protected by their religious beliefs. However, the court ruled that passive resistance constitutes obstruction under Michigan law and maintained that the law was applied neutrally. The protesters were sentenced to 45 days in jail, highlighting the judiciary’s stance on the limits of religious and protest activities within legal boundaries.

Michigan Appeals Court Upholds Convictions of Abortion Protesters for Resisting Arrest and Trespassing Read More »

Supreme Court Unanimous: Government Officials Cannot Leverage their Positions to Suppress Dissent

By |

The implications of this case are profound and far-reaching. It sends a clear message to regulatory bodies nationwide: exercise your power cautiously, for the line between guidance and coercion is perilously thin. Vullo’s actions were perceived as an attack on the NRA’s very right to exist and advocate.

Supreme Court Unanimous: Government Officials Cannot Leverage their Positions to Suppress Dissent Read More »

Indiana Court Weighs Rights of Transgender Students Against Teacher’s Religious Beliefs

By |

The U.S. District Court Southern District of Indiana found that the “last names only” accommodation presented an undue burden not overcome by Groff when it caused “substantial student harm, and an unreasonable risk of liability” while “sharply contradicting the school’s legally entitled mission to foster a supportive environment for all.”

Indiana Court Weighs Rights of Transgender Students Against Teacher’s Religious Beliefs Read More »

Elon Musk v. Australia

Australia v. Elon Musk: Free Speech and an Abundance of Arrogance

By |

Wakeley, a Sydney suburb far from tourist hotspots, became the center of a global debate on freedom of speech after a terrorist attack on Bishop Mar Mari Emmanuel. The Australian eSafety Commissioner ordered the removal of graphic footage from social media, sparking controversy with tech billionaire Elon Musk. Should such content be censored globally? The debate rages on.

Australia v. Elon Musk: Free Speech and an Abundance of Arrogance Read More »

Scroll to Top