ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®  – News and Updates on Religious Liberty and Freedom
Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Church and State
  • In the News
  • In the News
  • Supreme Court
  • Free Speech
  • Legislation
Menu

If Parents Can Opt Out of Storybooks, Why Not the Ten Commandments?

Posted on June 13, 2025 by ReligiousLiberty.TV

The pending Supreme Court case on LGBTQ-themed books could open the door to a powerful new argument against religious display laws in schools.


At first glance, Mahmoud v. Taylor and the growing wave of Ten Commandments display laws in states like Louisiana, Arkansas, and Texas seem to come from opposite ends of the culture war. One centers on parents who want to shield their children from LGBTQ-themed books. The others impose religious messages in classrooms over the objections of non-Christian families. But viewed together, they raise an urgent constitutional question: should public schools force children to absorb messages that conflict with their family’s faith or beliefs — or should parents have a right to opt out?

In Mahmoud, the Supreme Court is reviewing whether Montgomery County, Maryland violated the Free Exercise Clause when it revoked a policy allowing religious parents to opt their children out of reading LGBTQ-inclusive books. The parents in that case don’t want to ban the books — just to have notice and the ability to say “no, not for my child.” Their claim rests on religious liberty: the right to guide their child’s moral education without government interference.

The Ten Commandments display laws, by contrast, do not offer any opt-out. Arkansas’s Act 573 and Texas’s S.B. 10 both require every public school classroom to display a large poster of the Ten Commandments and “In God We Trust,” regardless of what parents believe or want. These mandates are already facing legal challenges under the Establishment Clause, and rightly so. But if courts somehow uphold the displays — despite Stone v. Graham (1980) and recent injunctions like Roake v. Brumley — then the Mahmoud framework offers a next step: a constitutional claim for a parental opt-out.

Here’s the symmetry. In Mahmoud, religious parents seek to avoid exposure to what they consider a secular moral teaching that contradicts their beliefs. In Arkansas or Texas, non-Christian or secular parents face a state-imposed religious message they did not choose and cannot decline. If the Court says the First Amendment protects opt-out rights for the former, it should logically do the same for the latter. If religious liberty means anything, it includes the right not to be conscripted — or to have one’s children conscripted — into a state religious narrative.

The Court’s decision in Mahmoud, expected by July, could reshape how courts and legislatures approach parental rights. But its implications may run in unexpected directions. It could empower not just religious conservatives seeking exemptions from diversity programming — but also religious minorities and secular families resisting official displays of faith in public schools. Opt-out, once viewed as a conservative accommodation tool, could become a neutral constitutional principle — available to all.

Category: Current Events

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

©2025 ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom® – News and Updates on Religious Liberty and Freedom
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experience, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}