Menu
ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Articles
ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®

Supreme Court to Hear Christian Postal Employee Religious Discrimination Claim – Groff v. DeJoy

Posted on January 13, 2023January 13, 2023 by Michael Peabody

The Supreme Court on Friday agreed to hear an appeal from Gerald Groff, an evangelical Christian mail carrier, on his claim of employment discrimination. According to the complaint, the U.S. Postal Service denied Groff’s request to be exempted from working on Sundays due to his religious beliefs, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits workplace discrimination based on religion. This case could affect employers, forcing them to do more to accommodate their workers’ religious practices.

Gerald Groff, a postal worker at the Holtwood, Pennsylvania Post Office, is a Christian who observes the Sabbath on Sundays, believing the day is set aside for worship and rest. But when the United States Postal Service and the labor union entered a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) or union contract, it overruled a century of Congressionally-mandated Sunday Post Office closures, instituting a policy that required employees to work on Sundays and holidays to deliver Amazon packages.

At first, the USPS asked for volunteers, and they were chosen based on seniority. If there were not enough volunteers, the Postmaster told Groff he had to work on Sundays and violate his religious beliefs or find another job. Groff refused, prompting the Postmaster to email other workers to see if someone could cover his shift. But when volunteers were not always available, and Groff still skipped Sundays, other workers and supervisors grew angry, and the Postal Service disciplined Groff for poor attendance.


The Supreme Court’s 1977 ruling in TWA v. Hardison established that employers need not accommodate employees’ religious beliefs if doing so incurs an undue hardship, defined as a “de minimis cost or expense.” This has traditionally made it very difficult for employees who have requested religious accommodation.

The issue of religious accommodation has been raised recently, with Founders’ First Freedom filing amicus briefs to the Supreme Court on two cases involving Seventh-day Adventists who had requested Saturday-Sabbath accommodation, including Patterson v. Walgreens (2020) and Dalberiste v. GLE Associates (2021). But the Court declined to hear the arguments in both cases despite three justices stating that they thought the “undue hardship” argument should be revisited.

The issues raised in the Petition filed by attorneys for Gerald Groff are: (1) Whether the Court should disapprove the more-than-de-minimis-cost test for refusing religious accommodations under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 stated in Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hardison; and (2) whether an employer may demonstrate “undue hardship on the conduct of the employer’s business” under Title VII merely by showing that the requested accommodation burdens the employee’s coworkers rather than the business itself.

Mr. Groff is represented by First Liberty Institute. Oral arguments are not yet scheduled but will likely take place this spring.

Case: Groff v. DeJoy – Supreme Court Docket No. 22-174

  • Gerald Groff
  • Groff v Dejoy
  • Hardison v. TWA
  • religious liberty
  • Sabbath Accommodation
  • Sunday accommmodation
  • U.S. Postal Service
  • Tweets by RelLibertyTV

    Recent Posts

    • U.S. District Court Dismisses Hunter v. US Dept of Education Lawsuit

      U.S. District Court Dismisses Hunter v. US Dept of Education Lawsuit

      February 5, 2023
    • Colorado Court: Baker Must Provide "Non-Expressive" Cake to Transgender Customer

      Colorado Court: Baker Must Provide "Non-Expressive" Cake to Transgender Customer

      January 30, 2023
    • Analysis of AB 2098 and Its Potential to Suppress Free Speech of Medical Professionals in California

      Analysis of AB 2098 and Its Potential to Suppress Free Speech of Medical Professionals in California

      January 11, 2023
    • Idaho Supreme Court Denies Petition to Recognize Fundamental Right to Abortion

      Idaho Supreme Court Denies Petition to Recognize Fundamental Right to Abortion

      January 9, 2023
    • Exploring the Potential Risks of CBDC - Privacy, Freedom and Economy Impacts

      Exploring the Potential Risks of CBDC - Privacy, Freedom and Economy Impacts

      December 29, 2022

    We are not a law firm, do not provide any legal services, legal advice or “lawyer referral services” and do not provide or participate in any legal representation.

    ©2023 ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom® | WordPress Theme by Superb Themes
    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experience, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    {title} {title} {title}