Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization

Q: What court decided Jackson Women's Health Organization?

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization was decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2022.

Q: What legal issues are involved in Jackson Women's Health Organization?

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization involves the following religious liberty issues: Healthcare & Conscience.

The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion.

ReligiousLiberty.TV

February 26, 2026

0 min read

Year: 2022 Court: U.S. Supreme Court

Healthcare & Conscience

Holding: The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion.

Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Official Documents

No official documents found yet.

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 opinion

Supreme Court declines Kim Davis appeal that sought to overturn Obergefell November 14, 2025

Referenced
Ex-Kentucky Clerk Seeks to Use 'Religious Liberty' Defense to Strike Down Obergefell July 25, 2025

Referenced
South Carolina Supreme Court Upholds Heartbeat Abortion Ban Definition May 18, 2025

Referenced
New Legal-Philosophical Paper Challenges Core Arguments for Abortion Rights April 15, 2025

Referenced
Statement on the Leak in Dobbs May 14, 2022

Referenced

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization is a Healthcare & Conscience case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2022. The court held that the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion.

1
Mahmoud v. Taylor606 U.S. 522 (2025)
3
U.S. Supreme Court
Parents have a fundamental right to direct the upbringing and medical care of their children without state interference.
📄 Opinion available
2
Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump607 U.S. ____ (2026) (2026)
3
U.S. Supreme Court
The President cannot use emergency statutes to bypass Congress for actions of vast economic or political significance without…
3
Doe XXV v. Archdiocese of New York, Our Lady of Mount Carmel Church, and Our Lady of Mount Carmel School2026 NY Slip Op 30269(U) (2026)
3
State Appellate Court
Neutral principles of negligent hiring and supervision apply to religious institutions; First Amendment does not shield religious organizations…
4
New England Synod, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, et al. v. Department of Homeland Security, et al.25-40102-FDS (2026)
2
U.S. District Court
Pro-Religion
A DHS policy permitting warrantless immigration enforcement at churches violates RFRA by substantially burdening religious exercise without using…
📄 Opinion available
5
United States v. Don Lemon(2026)
2
U.S. District Court
Pending
The government indicted Don Lemon under the FACE Act for alleged coordination in disrupting religious worship, though judges…
6
Groff v. DeJoy600 U.S. 447 (2023)
2
U.S. Supreme Court
Employers cannot deny religious accommodation to workers unless it causes substantial increased costs or burdens on business operations.
📄 Opinion available
7
Bill 21 (Supreme Court of Canada Appeal)(2026)
2
U.S. Supreme Court
Pending
8
Troogstad v. City of Chicago25-1575 (2025)
2
Plaintiffs failed to demonstrate how a COVID-19 vaccine mandate burdened their specific religious practices under the Free Exercise…
📄 Opinion available
9
Wailes v. Jefferson County Public Schools(2025)
2
Remanded
District court dismissal of parents' challenge to school's policy of assigning students to overnight accommodations based on gender…
📄 Opinion available
10
Union Gospel Mission of Yakima Washington v. Nick Brown24-7246 (2026)
2
The First Amendment's church autonomy doctrine extends beyond the ministerial exception to protect a religious organization's decision to…
📄 Opinion available