Donna Sheedy v. Adventist Health Systems Sunbelt Healthcare Corporation
The court dismissed the case for lack of standing because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a concrete injury in fact from alleged ERISA violations.
By ReligiousLiberty.TV • February 28, 2026 • U.S. Const. amend. I
Cite This Case
Donna Sheedy v. Adventist Health Systems Sunbelt Healthcare Corporation (D. 2020).
✓ Copied!Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.
Donna Sheedy v. Adventist Health Systems Sunbelt Healthcare Corporation (U.S. District Court, 2020). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/sheedy-v-adventist-health-systems/
✓ Copied!For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.
Donna Sheedy v. Adventist Health Systems Sunbelt Healthcare Corporation [U.S. District Court, 2020] — The court dismissed the case for lack of standing because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a concrete injury in fact from alleged ERISA violations. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/sheedy-v-adventist-health-systems/, accessed October 25, 2026).
✓ Copied!For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.
Year: 2020 Court: U.S. District Court Outcome:Dismissed
Holding: The court dismissed the case for lack of standing because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a concrete injury in fact from alleged ERISA violations.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.
Donna Sheedy v. Adventist Health Systems Sunbelt Healthcare Corporation is a Healthcare & Conscience case decided by the U.S. District Court in 2020. The court held that the court dismissed the case for lack of standing because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a concrete injury in fact from alleged ERISA violations. The case resulted in a Dismissed outcome.