Virginia regulations requiring that abortions be provided in outpatient surgical hospitals present a substantial obstacle and impose an undue burden on abortion access in violation of the Due Process Clause.
By ReligiousLiberty.TV • February 26, 2026 • U.S. Const. amend. I
Cite This Case
Falls Church Medical Center, LLC v. Oliver (D. 2019).
✓ Copied!Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.
Falls Church Medical Center, LLC v. Oliver (U.S. District Court, 2019). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/falls-church-medical-center/
✓ Copied!For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.
Falls Church Medical Center, LLC v. Oliver [U.S. District Court, 2019] — Virginia regulations requiring that abortions be provided in outpatient surgical hospitals present a substantial obstacle and impose an undue burden on abortion access in violation of the Due Process Clause. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/falls-church-medical-center/, accessed October 26, 2026).
✓ Copied!For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.
Holding: Virginia regulations requiring that abortions be provided in outpatient surgical hospitals present a substantial obstacle and impose an undue burden on abortion access in violation of the Due Process Clause.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.
Falls Church Medical Center, LLC v. Oliver is a Healthcare & Conscience case decided by the U.S. District Court in 2019. The court held that virginia regulations requiring that abortions be provided in outpatient surgical hospitals present a substantial obstacle and impose an undue burden on abortion access in violation of the Due Process Clause.