A federal district court judge dismissed a constitutional challenge to Hawaii’s 1998 same-sex marriage ban, finding that such decisions should be left to the Legislature rather than the courts.
✓ Copied!Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.
Jackson v. Abercrombie (U.S. District Court, 2012). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/jackson/
✓ Copied!For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.
Jackson v. Abercrombie [U.S. District Court, 2012] — A federal district court judge dismissed a constitutional challenge to Hawaii's 1998 same-sex marriage ban, finding that such decisions should be left to the Legislature rather than the courts. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/jackson/, accessed April 13, 2026).
✓ Copied!For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.
Holding: A federal district court judge dismissed a constitutional challenge to Hawaii's 1998 same-sex marriage ban, finding that such decisions should be left to the Legislature rather than the courts.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.
Jackson v. Abercrombie is a LGBTQ & Religious Liberty case decided by the U.S. District Court in 2012. The court held that a federal district court judge dismissed a constitutional challenge to Hawaii's 1998 same-sex marriage ban, finding that such decisions should be left to the Legislature rather than the courts.
To provide the best experience, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
