The most comprehensive online resource for tracking connections and patterns in U.S. religious liberty case law — covering First Amendment, RFRA, and conscience rights since 2008.
New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms v. New York State Senate
Liberty Counsel filed a lawsuit seeking to declare New York's Marriage Equality Act void and to invalidate same-sex marriages on grounds of procedural defects in the statute's passage.
New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms v. New York State Senate, No. Livingston Co. Sup. Ct., filed 6/25/2011 (2011).
✓ Copied!Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms v. New York State Senate, No. Livingston Co. Sup. Ct., filed 6/25/2011 (State Appellate Court, 2011). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/new-yorkers-for-constitutional-freedoms/
✓ Copied!For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms v. New York State Senate (No. Livingston Co. Sup. Ct., filed 6/25/2011) [State Appellate Court, 2011] — Liberty Counsel filed a lawsuit seeking to declare New York's Marriage Equality Act void and to invalidate same-sex marriages on grounds of procedural defects in the statute's passage. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/new-yorkers-for-constitutional-freedoms/, accessed July 4, 2026).
✓ Copied!For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
Holding: Liberty Counsel filed a lawsuit seeking to declare New York's Marriage Equality Act void and to invalidate same-sex marriages on grounds of procedural defects in the statute's passage.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.
New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms v. New York State Senate (Livingston Co. Sup. Ct., filed 6/25/2011) is a Church & State case decided by the State Appellate Court in 2011. The court held that liberty Counsel filed a lawsuit seeking to declare New York's Marriage Equality Act void and to invalidate same-sex marriages on grounds of procedural defects in the statute's passage. The case resulted in a Pending outcome.
To provide the best experience, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.