Federal / State Docket // Archival Dispatch
National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra
A California law requiring pro-life pregnancy centers to provide abortion information likely violated the First Amendment as an unconstitutional compelled speech requirement.
Cite This Case
National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra, 138 S. Ct. 2361 (2018).
✓ Copied!
Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra, 138 S. Ct. 2361 (U.S. Supreme Court, 2018). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/nifla-v-becerra/
✓ Copied!
For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra (138 S. Ct. 2361) [U.S. Supreme Court, 2018] — A California law requiring pro-life pregnancy centers to provide abortion information likely violated the First Amendment as an unconstitutional compelled speech requirement. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/nifla-v-becerra/, accessed October 17, 2026).
✓ Copied!
For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
Holding: A California law requiring pro-life pregnancy centers to provide abortion information likely violated the First Amendment as an unconstitutional compelled speech requirement.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.
Official Documents
National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra (138 S. Ct. 2361) is a Free Speech & Religion case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2018. The court held that a California law requiring pro-life pregnancy centers to provide abortion information likely violated the First Amendment as an unconstitutional compelled speech requirement.