Pro-life groups have standing to challenge an Ohio election statute under which they were threatened with prosecution for making statements about members of Congress' voting records on taxpayer-funded abortion.
By ReligiousLiberty.TV • March 3, 2026 • U.S. Const. amend. I
Cite This Case
Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus (U.S. 2014).
✓ Copied!Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.
Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus (U.S. Supreme Court, 2014). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/susan-b-anthony-list-v-driehaus/
✓ Copied!For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.
Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus [U.S. Supreme Court, 2014] — Pro-life groups have standing to challenge an Ohio election statute under which they were threatened with prosecution for making statements about members of Congress' voting records on taxpayer-funded abortion. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/susan-b-anthony-list-v-driehaus/, accessed October 25, 2026).
✓ Copied!For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.
Holding: Pro-life groups have standing to challenge an Ohio election statute under which they were threatened with prosecution for making statements about members of Congress' voting records on taxpayer-funded abortion.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.
Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus is a Free Speech & Religion case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2014. The court held that pro-life groups have standing to challenge an Ohio election statute under which they were threatened with prosecution for making statements about members of Congress' voting records on taxpayer-funded abortion.