Menu
ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Articles
ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®

Illinois law requiring moment of silence in public schools ruled unconstitutional

Posted on January 21, 2009January 21, 2009 by Michael Peabody

CHICAGO – Today, Judge Robert W. Gettleman of the federal U.S. District Court in Chicago ruled that a state law mandating a moment of silence in Illinois public schools is an unconstitutional endorsement of religion.  He had previously put the Illinois Silent Reflection and Student Prayer Act on hold while he considered the case filed by an atheist parent on behalf of his daughter.

The Illinois General Assembly had passed the law to allow students the choice to simply reflect on the day’s activities or pray, and proponents argued that this did not compel religious practice.  However, the court found that the intent of the law was to encourage organized prayer in schools, and pointed to arguments made on the Assembly floor equating the moment of silence with legislative prayers.   The court also found that the law favored religions that practice silent prayer over those who do not. 

“Students remain free to pray on their own, in a non-disruptive manner, throughout the school day,” ACLU lawyer Adam Schwartz said in a statement. “As Judge Gettleman recognized in his decision, public school students in Illinois do not require the permission of the General Assembly to engage in this constitutionally protected activity. ”

The court  upheld the principle that students have a constitutional right to pray on their own at any time and that the government or the schools should not arbitrate when and how students pray.

  • ACLU
  • Adam Schwartz
  • Chicago
  • Judge Gettleman
  • moment of silence
  • Robert W. Gettleman
  • school prayer
  • 14 thoughts on “Illinois law requiring moment of silence in public schools ruled unconstitutional”

    1. Phineas Media says:
      January 29, 2009 at 10:02 am

      I agree with the ruling by Judge Gettleman. There should be a separation between church and state. Since public schools are run on federal money, the state should not mandate when and how students pray or if they should pray at all. If parents insist that their children must pray while at school, perhaps they should consider placing them in a parochial school or teach them from home.

      1. Contemporary Furniture says:
        November 2, 2010 at 2:42 am

        I do also agree with him. Students must have freewill.

    2. Phineas Media says:
      January 29, 2009 at 3:02 am

      I agree with the ruling by Judge Gettleman. There should be a separation between church and state. Since public schools are run on federal money, the state should not mandate when and how students pray or if they should pray at all. If parents insist that their children must pray while at school, perhaps they should consider placing them in a parochial school or teach them from home.

      1. Contemporary Furniture says:
        November 1, 2010 at 7:42 pm

        I do also agree with him. Students must have freewill.

    3. Viva says:
      January 31, 2009 at 11:36 pm

      I think anybody could observe a moment of silence on their own time at any time of their choosing. Nobody would know if they were praying or meditating if they just remained silent. There is no need to worry about moments of silence.

    4. Viva says:
      January 31, 2009 at 4:36 pm

      I think anybody could observe a moment of silence on their own time at any time of their choosing. Nobody would know if they were praying or meditating if they just remained silent. There is no need to worry about moments of silence.

    5. AAA says:
      February 2, 2009 at 2:36 am

      It IS unconstitutional – as is having “In God We Trust” on our money or having people take oaths on a freaking Bible. Schools are there to teach kids facts – not beliefs. And while everyone should still have the freedom to do religious things peacefully, a kind of “group effort” with a moment of silence is discriminating, forceful, and brainwashing.

    6. AAA says:
      February 1, 2009 at 7:36 pm

      It IS unconstitutional – as is having “In God We Trust” on our money or having people take oaths on a freaking Bible. Schools are there to teach kids facts – not beliefs. And while everyone should still have the freedom to do religious things peacefully, a kind of “group effort” with a moment of silence is discriminating, forceful, and brainwashing.

    7. Matt says:
      February 2, 2009 at 3:26 am

      There is absolutely no reason for children to sit through a moment of silence in schools. It adds no value to the educational process. The moment of silence is a way to mandate prayer in schools without actually saying that is what you are doing.

    8. Matt says:
      February 1, 2009 at 8:26 pm

      There is absolutely no reason for children to sit through a moment of silence in schools. It adds no value to the educational process. The moment of silence is a way to mandate prayer in schools without actually saying that is what you are doing.

    9. K2 Incense says:
      November 12, 2010 at 6:26 am

      I don’t see how a moment of silence could imply religion. Typically you will see a moment of silence after an accident or death and this could be used as a way of grieving.

    10. K2 Incense says:
      November 11, 2010 at 11:26 pm

      I don’t see how a moment of silence could imply religion. Typically you will see a moment of silence after an accident or death and this could be used as a way of grieving.

    11. K2 Herb says:
      November 18, 2010 at 12:36 am

      I also agree that students shouldn’t even have to say the pledge of allegence let alone a moment of silent prayer. What is this country coming to?

    12. K2 Herb says:
      November 17, 2010 at 5:36 pm

      I also agree that students shouldn’t even have to say the pledge of allegence let alone a moment of silent prayer. What is this country coming to?

    Comments are closed.

    Tweets by RelLibertyTV

    Recent Posts

    • Colorado Court: Baker Must Provide "Non-Expressive" Cake to Transgender Customer

      Colorado Court: Baker Must Provide "Non-Expressive" Cake to Transgender Customer

      January 30, 2023
    • Supreme Court to Hear Christian Postal Employee Religious Discrimination Claim - Groff v. DeJoy

      Supreme Court to Hear Christian Postal Employee Religious Discrimination Claim - Groff v. DeJoy

      January 13, 2023
    • Analysis of AB 2098 and Its Potential to Suppress Free Speech of Medical Professionals in California

      Analysis of AB 2098 and Its Potential to Suppress Free Speech of Medical Professionals in California

      January 11, 2023
    • Idaho Supreme Court Denies Petition to Recognize Fundamental Right to Abortion

      Idaho Supreme Court Denies Petition to Recognize Fundamental Right to Abortion

      January 9, 2023
    • Exploring the Potential Risks of CBDC - Privacy, Freedom and Economy Impacts

      Exploring the Potential Risks of CBDC - Privacy, Freedom and Economy Impacts

      December 29, 2022

    We are not a law firm, do not provide any legal services, legal advice or “lawyer referral services” and do not provide or participate in any legal representation.

    ©2023 ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom® | WordPress Theme by Superb Themes
    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experience, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    {title} {title} {title}