Bella Health and Wellness v. Colorado

Q: What court decided Colorado?

Bella Health and Wellness v. Colorado was decided by the U.S. District Court in 2025.

Q: What legal issues are involved in Colorado?

Bella Health and Wellness v. Colorado involves the following religious liberty issues: Free Exercise, Healthcare & Conscience.

Colorado’s law prohibiting abortion pill reversal violates the Free Exercise Clause because it targets religious medical providers and is not generally applicable to comparable secular conduct.

ReligiousLiberty.TV

February 26, 2026

0 min read

Year: 2025 Court: U.S. District Court

Free Exercise Healthcare & Conscience

Holding: Colorado's law prohibiting abortion pill reversal violates the Free Exercise Clause because it targets religious medical providers and is not generally applicable to comparable secular conduct.

Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Official Documents

No official documents found yet.

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 opinion

Federal Court Blocks Colorado Law Restricting “Abortion Pill Reversal” for Religious Medical Providers August 4, 2025

Primary coverage

Bella Health and Wellness v. Colorado is a Free Exercise case decided by the U.S. District Court in 2025. The court held that colorado's law prohibiting abortion pill reversal violates the Free Exercise Clause because it targets religious medical providers and is not generally applicable to comparable secular conduct.

1
Mahmoud v. Taylor606 U.S. 522 (2025)
2
U.S. Supreme Court
Parents have a fundamental right to direct the upbringing and medical care of their children without state interference.
📄 Opinion available
2
Gilfillan v. City of Philadelphia637 F.2d 924 (1980)
2
Philadelphia violated the Establishment Clause by spending taxpayer funds to build a platform for a papal mass and…
📄 Opinion available
3
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.573 U.S. 682 (2014)
2
U.S. Supreme Court
Religious liberty protections under RFRA apply to closely held for-profit corporations.
📄 Opinion available
4
Hubersberger v. State2 CA-CV 2025-0188 (2026)
1
Religious motivation does not provide immunity from neutral criminal laws protecting private property; the state may prosecute trespassers…
📄 Opinion available
5
Roake v. BrumleyNo. 24-30 (2026)
1
Anti-Religion
A preliminary injunction blocking Louisiana's Ten Commandments display law is vacated because plaintiffs' legal challenge is not yet…
6
Nathan v. Alamo Heights Independent School District(2026)
1
Pending
The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is reconsidering whether Texas can mandate Ten Commandments displays in public…
7
Kimberly Ann Polk v. Montgomery County Board of Education
1
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a substitute teacher's lawsuit challenging a school district…
8
United States v. Don Lemon(2026)
1
U.S. District Court
Pending
The government indicted Don Lemon under the FACE Act for alleged coordination in disrupting religious worship, though judges…
9
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. DoeNo. 24-856 (2026)
1
U.S. Supreme Court
Pending
The Court must determine if U.S. corporations can be sued under the Alien Tort Statute and Torture Victim…
📄 Opinion available
10
Satanic Temple, Inc. v. RokitaNo. 23-3247 (2026)
1
The Satanic Temple lacks associational standing to challenge Indiana's abortion ban because it failed to identify specific injured…
📄 Opinion available