FIRST AMENDMENT • SUPREME COURT DOCKETS • APPELLATE WIRE Tuesday, October 27, 2026 // ARCHIVAL BROADSHEET EDITION
Constitutional Jurisprudence & Broadcast Dispatches

ReligiousLiberty.TV

Federal / State Docket // Archival Dispatch

Moyle v. United States

The Court declined to hear the case, leaving in place the lower court's injunction that EMTALA preempts Idaho's restrictive abortion law.
Cite This Case
Moyle v. United States, No. 23–726 (U.S. 2009).
✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
Moyle v. United States, No. 23–726 (U.S. Supreme Court, 2009). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/moyle-v-united-states/
✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
Moyle v. United States (No. 23–726) [U.S. Supreme Court, 2009] — The Court declined to hear the case, leaving in place the lower court's injunction that EMTALA preempts Idaho's restrictive abortion law. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/moyle-v-united-states/, accessed October 28, 2026).
✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
Citation: No. 23–726 Year: 2009 Court: U.S. Supreme Court Outcome: Dismissed
Holding: The Court declined to hear the case, leaving in place the lower court's injunction that EMTALA preempts Idaho's restrictive abortion law.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 opinion

Moyle v. United States (No. 23–726) is a Free Exercise case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2009. The court held that the Court declined to hear the case, leaving in place the lower court's injunction that EMTALA preempts Idaho's restrictive abortion law. The case resulted in a Dismissed outcome.