Frankel v. UCLA

Q: What court decided UCLA?

Frankel v. UCLA was decided by the U.S. District Court in 2024.

Q: Who won UCLA?

The outcome in Frankel v. UCLA was: Pending. Jewish students sued UCLA for failing to protect them from antisemitic harassment and exclusion from campus areas during a protest encampment.

Q: What legal issues are involved in UCLA?

Frankel v. UCLA involves the following religious liberty issues: Free Exercise, Free Speech & Religion.

Jewish students sued UCLA for failing to protect them from antisemitic harassment and exclusion from campus areas during a protest encampment.

ReligiousLiberty.TV

February 26, 2026

0 min read

Year: 2024 Court: U.S. District Court Outcome: Pending

Free Exercise Free Speech & Religion

Holding: Jewish students sued UCLA for failing to protect them from antisemitic harassment and exclusion from campus areas during a protest encampment.

Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Official Documents

No official documents found yet.

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 opinion

Jewish Students File Lawsuit Against UCLA Over Alleged Antisemitism and Campus Exclusion June 6, 2024

Referenced

Frankel v. UCLA is a Free Exercise case decided by the U.S. District Court in 2024. The court held that jewish students sued UCLA for failing to protect them from antisemitic harassment and exclusion from campus areas during a protest encampment. The case resulted in a Pending outcome.

1
Mahmoud v. Taylor606 U.S. 522 (2025)
2
U.S. Supreme Court
Parents have a fundamental right to direct the upbringing and medical care of their children without state interference.
📄 Opinion available
2
Gilfillan v. City of Philadelphia637 F.2d 924 (1980)
2
Philadelphia violated the Establishment Clause by spending taxpayer funds to build a platform for a papal mass and…
📄 Opinion available
3
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.573 U.S. 682 (2014)
2
U.S. Supreme Court
Religious liberty protections under RFRA apply to closely held for-profit corporations.
📄 Opinion available
4
Hubersberger v. State2 CA-CV 2025-0188 (2026)
1
Religious motivation does not provide immunity from neutral criminal laws protecting private property; the state may prosecute trespassers…
📄 Opinion available
5
Roake v. BrumleyNo. 24-30 (2026)
1
Anti-Religion
A preliminary injunction blocking Louisiana's Ten Commandments display law is vacated because plaintiffs' legal challenge is not yet…
6
Nathan v. Alamo Heights Independent School District(2026)
1
Pending
The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is reconsidering whether Texas can mandate Ten Commandments displays in public…
7
Kimberly Ann Polk v. Montgomery County Board of Education
1
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a substitute teacher's lawsuit challenging a school district…
8
United States v. Don Lemon(2026)
1
U.S. District Court
Pending
The government indicted Don Lemon under the FACE Act for alleged coordination in disrupting religious worship, though judges…
9
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. DoeNo. 24-856 (2026)
1
U.S. Supreme Court
Pending
The Court must determine if U.S. corporations can be sued under the Alien Tort Statute and Torture Victim…
📄 Opinion available
10
Satanic Temple, Inc. v. RokitaNo. 23-3247 (2026)
1
The Satanic Temple lacks associational standing to challenge Indiana's abortion ban because it failed to identify specific injured…
📄 Opinion available