Klein v. Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries

Q: What court decided Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries?

Klein v. Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries was decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2019.

Q: Who won Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries?

The outcome in Klein v. Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries was: Remanded. The Supreme Court threw out a decision against bakers who refused to provide a cake for a same-sex wedding and sent it back to the lower courts for review in light of Masterpiece Cakeshop.

Q: What legal issues are involved in Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries?

Klein v. Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries involves the following religious liberty issues: Free Exercise, Free Speech & Religion, LGBTQ & Religious Liberty.

The Supreme Court threw out a decision against bakers who refused to provide a cake for a same-sex wedding and sent it back to the lower courts for review in light of Masterpiece Cakeshop.

ReligiousLiberty.TV

February 26, 2026

0 min read

Year: 2019 Court: U.S. Supreme Court Outcome: Remanded

Free Exercise Free Speech & Religion LGBTQ & Religious Liberty

Holding: The Supreme Court threw out a decision against bakers who refused to provide a cake for a same-sex wedding and sent it back to the lower courts for review in light of Masterpiece Cakeshop.

Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Official Documents

No official documents found yet.

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 opinion

High Court reverses Oregon finding against bakers and sends case back to lower court for further review June 17, 2019

Referenced

Klein v. Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries is a Free Exercise case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2019. The court held that the Supreme Court threw out a decision against bakers who refused to provide a cake for a same-sex wedding and sent it back to the lower courts for review in light of Masterpiece Cakeshop. The case resulted in a Remanded outcome.

1
Mahmoud v. Taylor606 U.S. 522 (2025)
2
U.S. Supreme Court
Parents have a fundamental right to direct the upbringing and medical care of their children without state interference.
📄 Opinion available
2
Gilfillan v. City of Philadelphia637 F.2d 924 (1980)
2
Philadelphia violated the Establishment Clause by spending taxpayer funds to build a platform for a papal mass and…
📄 Opinion available
3
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.573 U.S. 682 (2014)
2
U.S. Supreme Court
Religious liberty protections under RFRA apply to closely held for-profit corporations.
📄 Opinion available
4
Hubersberger v. State2 CA-CV 2025-0188 (2026)
1
Religious motivation does not provide immunity from neutral criminal laws protecting private property; the state may prosecute trespassers…
📄 Opinion available
5
Roake v. BrumleyNo. 24-30 (2026)
1
Anti-Religion
A preliminary injunction blocking Louisiana's Ten Commandments display law is vacated because plaintiffs' legal challenge is not yet…
6
Nathan v. Alamo Heights Independent School District(2026)
1
Pending
The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is reconsidering whether Texas can mandate Ten Commandments displays in public…
7
Kimberly Ann Polk v. Montgomery County Board of Education
1
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a substitute teacher's lawsuit challenging a school district…
8
United States v. Don Lemon(2026)
1
U.S. District Court
Pending
The government indicted Don Lemon under the FACE Act for alleged coordination in disrupting religious worship, though judges…
9
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. DoeNo. 24-856 (2026)
1
U.S. Supreme Court
Pending
The Court must determine if U.S. corporations can be sued under the Alien Tort Statute and Torture Victim…
📄 Opinion available
10
Satanic Temple, Inc. v. RokitaNo. 23-3247 (2026)
1
The Satanic Temple lacks associational standing to challenge Indiana's abortion ban because it failed to identify specific injured…
📄 Opinion available