Skip to content
September 14, 2026
Independent reporting and primary-source research on religious liberty and the First Amendment since 2008.
ReligiousLiberty.TV Law · Liberty · Conscience
Subscribe
Legal Case Library
Legal Case

City of Boerne v. Flores

The Religious Freedom Restoration Act does not apply to state and local governments unless explicitly enacted by state legislatures.
ReligiousLiberty.TV February 26, 2026 1 min read
Cite This Case
City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (1997).
✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (U.S. Supreme Court, 1997). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/city-of-boerne/
✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
City of Boerne v. Flores (521 U.S. 507) [U.S. Supreme Court, 1997] — The Religious Freedom Restoration Act does not apply to state and local governments unless explicitly enacted by state legislatures. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/city-of-boerne/, accessed September 14, 2026).
✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
Citation: 521 U.S. 507 Year: 1997 Court: U.S. Supreme Court
Holding: The Religious Freedom Restoration Act does not apply to state and local governments unless explicitly enacted by state legislatures.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Official Documents

City of Boerne v. Flores (521 U.S. 507) is a Church & State case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1997. The court held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act does not apply to state and local governments unless explicitly enacted by state legislatures.

ReligiousLiberty.TV