July 12, 2026

ReligiousLiberty.TV

The most comprehensive online resource for tracking connections and patterns in U.S. religious liberty case law — covering First Amendment, RFRA, and conscience rights since 2008.

Baltas v. Garner Correctional Institution

Federal appeals court upheld dismissal of inmate's religious freedom and due process claims on qualified immunity grounds where law was not clearly established.

Cite This Case
Baltas v. Garner Correctional Institution (2025).
✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).

⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.

Baltas v. Garner Correctional Institution (2025). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/baltas/
✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.

⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.

Baltas v. Garner Correctional Institution [2025] — Federal appeals court upheld dismissal of inmate's religious freedom and due process claims on qualified immunity grounds where law was not clearly established. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/baltas/, accessed July 12, 2026).
✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.

⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.

Year: 2025
Holding: Federal appeals court upheld dismissal of inmate's religious freedom and due process claims on qualified immunity grounds where law was not clearly established.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Official Documents

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 opinion

Baltas v. Garner Correctional Institution is a Free Exercise case in 2025. The court held that federal appeals court upheld dismissal of inmate's religious freedom and due process claims on qualified immunity grounds where law was not clearly established.