Skip to content
September 20, 2026
Independent reporting and primary-source research on religious liberty and the First Amendment since 2008.
ReligiousLiberty.TV Law · Liberty · Conscience
Subscribe
Legal Case Library
Legal Case

Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe

The Court must determine if U.S. corporations can be sued under the Alien Tort Statute and Torture Victim Protection Act for aiding and abetting foreign human rights abuses involving religious persecution.
ReligiousLiberty.TV February 26, 2026 1 min read
Cite This Case
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe, No. 24-856 (U.S. 2026).
✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe, No. 24-856 (U.S. Supreme Court, 2026). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/cisco/
✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe (No. 24-856) [U.S. Supreme Court, 2026] — The Court must determine if U.S. corporations can be sued under the Alien Tort Statute and Torture Victim Protection Act for aiding and abetting foreign human rights abuses involving religious persecution. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/cisco/, accessed September 20, 2026).
✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
Citation: No. 24-856 Year: 2026 Court: U.S. Supreme Court Outcome: Pending
Holding: The Court must determine if U.S. corporations can be sued under the Alien Tort Statute and Torture Victim Protection Act for aiding and abetting foreign human rights abuses involving religious persecution.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe (No. 24-856) is a Free Exercise case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2026. The court held that the Court must determine if U.S. corporations can be sued under the Alien Tort Statute and Torture Victim Protection Act for aiding and abetting foreign human rights abuses involving religious persecution. The case resulted in a Pending outcome.

ReligiousLiberty.TV