City and County of San Francisco v. Horton — ReligiousLiberty.TV

Q: What court decided Horton?

City and County of San Francisco v. Horton was decided by the State Appellate Court in 2009.

Q: What is the citation for Horton?

The official citation for City and County of San Francisco v. Horton is S168078.

Q: What legal issues are involved in Horton?

City and County of San Francisco v. Horton involves the following religious liberty issues: Church & State, LGBTQ & Religious Liberty.

Cite This Case

City and County of San Francisco v. Horton, No. S168078 (2009).

✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).

City and County of San Francisco v. Horton, No. S168078 (State Appellate Court, 2009). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/city-and-county-of-san-francisco-v-horton/

✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.

City and County of San Francisco v. Horton (No. S168078) [State Appellate Court, 2009] — Consolidated case addressing Proposition 8's constitutional validity and effect on same-sex marriages. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/city-and-county-of-san-francisco-v-horton/, accessed April 14, 2026).

✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.

Citation: S168078 Year: 2009 Court: State Appellate Court

Church & State LGBTQ & Religious Liberty

Holding: Consolidated case addressing Proposition 8's constitutional validity and effect on same-sex marriages.

Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Official Documents

📄 Read Opinion Article link

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 courtinfo.ca.gov opinion

VIDEO: California Supreme Court Oral Arguments on Prop 8 March 5, 2009

Primary coverage 📎 courtinfo.ca.gov opinion

City and County of San Francisco v. Horton (S168078) is a Church & State case decided by the State Appellate Court in 2009. The court held that consolidated case addressing Proposition 8's constitutional validity and effect on same-sex marriages.