July 4, 2026

ReligiousLiberty.TV

The most comprehensive online resource for tracking connections and patterns in U.S. religious liberty case law — covering First Amendment, RFRA, and conscience rights since 2008.

First Baptist Church of Ferndale v. City of Ferndale

A church has the right to use its property to provide charitable social services to the poor under the Religious Land Use Act of 2000.

Cite This Case
First Baptist Church of Ferndale v. City of Ferndale (2009).
✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).

⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.

First Baptist Church of Ferndale v. City of Ferndale (State Appellate Court, 2009). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/first-baptist-church-of-ferndale/
✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.

⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.

First Baptist Church of Ferndale v. City of Ferndale [State Appellate Court, 2009] — A church has the right to use its property to provide charitable social services to the poor under the Religious Land Use Act of 2000. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/first-baptist-church-of-ferndale/, accessed July 4, 2026).
✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.

⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.

Year: 2009 Court: State Appellate Court
Holding: A church has the right to use its property to provide charitable social services to the poor under the Religious Land Use Act of 2000.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

First Baptist Church of Ferndale v. City of Ferndale is a Free Exercise case decided by the State Appellate Court in 2009. The court held that a church has the right to use its property to provide charitable social services to the poor under the Religious Land Use Act of 2000.