An Indiana appellate court upheld the trial court's removal of a transgender minor from parents who refused to use preferred pronouns based on religious beliefs, finding that the child's health and welfare constituted a compelling state interest.
By ReligiousLiberty.TV • February 26, 2026 • U.S. Const. amend. I
Cite This Case
In re A.C. (Minor Child) (2022).
✓ Copied!Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.
In re A.C. (Minor Child) (State Appellate Court, 2022). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/in-re-a-c/
✓ Copied!For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.
In re A.C. (Minor Child) [State Appellate Court, 2022] — An Indiana appellate court upheld the trial court's removal of a transgender minor from parents who refused to use preferred pronouns based on religious beliefs, finding that the child's health and welfare constituted a compelling state interest. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/in-re-a-c/, accessed November 1, 2026).
✓ Copied!For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.
Holding: An Indiana appellate court upheld the trial court's removal of a transgender minor from parents who refused to use preferred pronouns based on religious beliefs, finding that the child's health and welfare constituted a compelling state interest.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.
In re A.C. (Minor Child) is a Education case decided by the State Appellate Court in 2022. The court held that an Indiana appellate court upheld the trial court's removal of a transgender minor from parents who refused to use preferred pronouns based on religious beliefs, finding that the child's health and welfare constituted a compelling state interest.