FIRST AMENDMENT • SUPREME COURT DOCKETS • APPELLATE WIRE Friday, October 23, 2026 // ARCHIVAL BROADSHEET EDITION
Constitutional Jurisprudence & Broadcast Dispatches

ReligiousLiberty.TV

Federal / State Docket // Archival Dispatch

Middleton v. Pan

A pro se RICO lawsuit challenging California's mandatory vaccination law removing religious exemptions was dismissed with prejudice.
Cite This Case
Middleton v. Pan, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13254 (CD CA, Jan. 25, 2018) (D. 2018).
✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
Middleton v. Pan, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13254 (CD CA, Jan. 25, 2018) (U.S. District Court, 2018). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/middleton-v-pan/
✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
Middleton v. Pan (2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13254 (CD CA, Jan. 25, 2018)) [U.S. District Court, 2018] — A pro se RICO lawsuit challenging California's mandatory vaccination law removing religious exemptions was dismissed with prejudice. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/middleton-v-pan/, accessed October 24, 2026).
✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
Citation: 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13254 (CD CA, Jan. 25, 2018) Year: 2018 Court: U.S. District Court
Holding: A pro se RICO lawsuit challenging California's mandatory vaccination law removing religious exemptions was dismissed with prejudice.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Official Documents

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 opinion

Middleton v. Pan (2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13254 (CD CA, Jan. 25, 2018)) is a Education case decided by the U.S. District Court in 2018. The court held that a pro se RICO lawsuit challenging California's mandatory vaccination law removing religious exemptions was dismissed with prejudice.