Middleton v. Pan

Q: What court decided Pan?

Middleton v. Pan was decided by the U.S. District Court in 2018.

Q: What is the citation for Pan?

The official citation for Middleton v. Pan is 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13254 (CD CA, Jan. 25, 2018).

Q: What legal issues are involved in Pan?

Middleton v. Pan involves the following religious liberty issues: Education, Free Exercise.

A pro se RICO lawsuit challenging California's mandatory vaccination law removing religious exemptions was dismissed with prejudice.

ReligiousLiberty.TV

February 26, 2026 1 min read

Cite This Case

Middleton v. Pan, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13254 (CD CA, Jan. 25, 2018) (D. 2018).

✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).

Middleton v. Pan, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13254 (CD CA, Jan. 25, 2018) (U.S. District Court, 2018). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/middleton-v-pan/

✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.

Middleton v. Pan (2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13254 (CD CA, Jan. 25, 2018)) [U.S. District Court, 2018] — A pro se RICO lawsuit challenging California's mandatory vaccination law removing religious exemptions was dismissed with prejudice. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/middleton-v-pan/, accessed July 25, 2026).

✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.

Citation: 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13254 (CD CA, Jan. 25, 2018) Year: 2018 Court: U.S. District Court

Education Free Exercise

Holding: A pro se RICO lawsuit challenging California's mandatory vaccination law removing religious exemptions was dismissed with prejudice.

Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Official Documents

📚 CourtListener

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 opinion

Pro se "RICO" case against CA mandatory vaccination law dismissed January 30, 2018

Referenced

Middleton v. Pan (2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13254 (CD CA, Jan. 25, 2018)) is a Education case decided by the U.S. District Court in 2018. The court held that a pro se RICO lawsuit challenging California's mandatory vaccination law removing religious exemptions was dismissed with prejudice.