Federal / State Docket // Archival Dispatch
Middleton v. Pan
A pro se RICO lawsuit challenging California's mandatory vaccination law removing religious exemptions was dismissed with prejudice.
Cite This Case
Middleton v. Pan, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13254 (CD CA, Jan. 25, 2018) (D. 2018).
✓ Copied!
Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
Middleton v. Pan, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13254 (CD CA, Jan. 25, 2018) (U.S. District Court, 2018). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/middleton-v-pan/
✓ Copied!
For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
Middleton v. Pan (2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13254 (CD CA, Jan. 25, 2018)) [U.S. District Court, 2018] — A pro se RICO lawsuit challenging California's mandatory vaccination law removing religious exemptions was dismissed with prejudice. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/middleton-v-pan/, accessed October 24, 2026).
✓ Copied!
For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
Holding: A pro se RICO lawsuit challenging California's mandatory vaccination law removing religious exemptions was dismissed with prejudice.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.
Official Documents
Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV
📎 Document links found in our articles:
📄 opinion
- Pro se "RICO" case against CA mandatory vaccination law dismissed January 30, 2018
Middleton v. Pan (2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13254 (CD CA, Jan. 25, 2018)) is a Education case decided by the U.S. District Court in 2018. The court held that a pro se RICO lawsuit challenging California's mandatory vaccination law removing religious exemptions was dismissed with prejudice.