Ninth Circuit reversed dismissal and found that Oregon Right to Life's anti-abortion stance is grounded in sincerely held religious belief entitled to First Amendment protection against state abortion coverage mandate.
By ReligiousLiberty.TV • February 28, 2026 • U.S. Const. amend. I
Cite This Case
Oregon Right to Life v. Stolfi (2025).
✓ Copied!Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.
Oregon Right to Life v. Stolfi (2025). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/oregon-right-to-life-v-stolfi/
✓ Copied!For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.
Oregon Right to Life v. Stolfi [2025] — Ninth Circuit reversed dismissal and found that Oregon Right to Life's anti-abortion stance is grounded in sincerely held religious belief entitled to First Amendment protection against state abortion coverage mandate. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/oregon-right-to-life-v-stolfi/, accessed October 27, 2026).
✓ Copied!For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.
Holding: Ninth Circuit reversed dismissal and found that Oregon Right to Life's anti-abortion stance is grounded in sincerely held religious belief entitled to First Amendment protection against state abortion coverage mandate.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.
Oregon Right to Life v. Stolfi is a Free Exercise case in 2025. The court held that ninth Circuit reversed dismissal and found that Oregon Right to Life's anti-abortion stance is grounded in sincerely held religious belief entitled to First Amendment protection against state abortion coverage mandate.