July 21, 2026

ReligiousLiberty.TV

The most comprehensive online resource for tracking connections and patterns in U.S. religious liberty case law — covering First Amendment, RFRA, and conscience rights since 2008.

Spillane v. Lamont

Connecticut Supreme Court precedent establishing sovereign immunity doctrine as binding in religious freedom claims.

Cite This Case
Spillane v. Lamont.
✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).

⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.

Spillane v. Lamont (State Appellate Court). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/spillane-v-lamont/
✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.

⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.

Spillane v. Lamont [State Appellate Court] — Connecticut Supreme Court precedent establishing sovereign immunity doctrine as binding in religious freedom claims. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/spillane-v-lamont/, accessed July 21, 2026).
✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.

⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.

Court: State Appellate Court
Holding: Connecticut Supreme Court precedent establishing sovereign immunity doctrine as binding in religious freedom claims.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Official Documents

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 opinion

Spillane v. Lamont is a Free Exercise case decided by the State Appellate Court. The court held that connecticut Supreme Court precedent establishing sovereign immunity doctrine as binding in religious freedom claims.