A florist who refused to provide flower arrangements for a same-sex wedding on religious grounds was found liable by Washington state courts.
By ReligiousLiberty.TV • February 26, 2026 • U.S. Const. amend. I
Cite This Case
State of Washington v. Baronelle Stutzman (2018).
✓ Copied!Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.
State of Washington v. Baronelle Stutzman (State Appellate Court, 2018). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/stutzman/
✓ Copied!For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.
State of Washington v. Baronelle Stutzman [State Appellate Court, 2018] — A florist who refused to provide flower arrangements for a same-sex wedding on religious grounds was found liable by Washington state courts. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/stutzman/, accessed November 1, 2026).
✓ Copied!For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.
State of Washington v. Baronelle Stutzman is a Free Exercise case decided by the State Appellate Court in 2018. The court held that a florist who refused to provide flower arrangements for a same-sex wedding on religious grounds was found liable by Washington state courts.