Menu
ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Articles
ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®

California agrees to stop enforcing restrictions on churches and to pay church attorney fees

Posted on May 24, 2021May 25, 2021 by ReligiousLiberty.TV
https://dd1.f06.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/6807554_1621985033.mp3

After a year of litigation, the state of California is ordered to back down and pay the attorney fees of a church that had to defend its civil right to meet.

On May 17, U.S. District Court Judge Jesus Bernal entered an order approving a settlement between the State of California and Harvest Rock Church. Included  in the settlement is a state-wide injunction against COVID restrictions on churches and places of worship. California has agreed to stop issuing or enforcing regulations issued in connection with COVID-19 that impose any capacity or numerical restrictions on religious worship services that are more severe than restrictions imposed on other similar gatherings of similar risk.

This settlement was nearly inevitable following U.S. Supreme Court decisions in several cases, including Tandon v. Newsom, South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. Newsom, Harvest Rock Church, Inc. v. Newsom, and Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo, that overturned restrictions that treated churches differently than other similarly situated entities

The order further blocked the state from enforcing any restrictions on the religious exercise of singing and chanting during religious services, other than guidelines generally issued for performances or similar activities.

From now on, the state can make recommendations but must make it clear that they are voluntary and not enforceable.

Finally, the court ordered the state to pay Harvest Rock Church in Pasadena, California, $1.35 million for the “reasonable attorney’s fees and costs necessarily incurred in this case.”  (For those interested, the statutory authority for the fees was the declaration that the Plaintiffs were the prevailing party under 42 U.S.C. section 1988 “Proceedings in vindication of civil rights.”)

This is a win for religious liberty and the idea that the state could block churches from opening simply because they were houses of worship is clearly unconstitutional. Churches are essential as a matter of law.

Unfortunately, on the other end of the United States, a church in Maine has filed a motion with the U.S. Supreme Court seeking to block Maine from enforcing capacity restrictions. According to the petition, “Maine imposes the most severe restrictions in the country on churches and places of worship.” Calvary Chapel of Bangor, Maine is represented by Liberty Counsel, the same legal group that successfully represented Harvest Rock Church in the California case.

  • Calvary Chapel of Bangor
  • church restrictions
  • Gavin Newsom
  • Harvest Rock Church
  • Liberty Counsel
  • 1 thought on “California agrees to stop enforcing restrictions on churches and to pay church attorney fees”

    1. Monte Sahlin says:
      May 25, 2021 at 7:28 am

      If public health measures designed to protect people from deadly disease is a religious liberty issue, what other potentially deadly behavior should be protected by First Amendment rights? Is it OK for a religious group to claim that heroin is a sacrament in their beliefs and they have the right to hand it out in return for donations? What if an ancient cult wants to sacrifice babies to their deity? I am afraid this opens the door to a great deal of disaster and God is not in it; it is political stupidity.

    Comments are closed.

    Tweets by RelLibertyTV

    Recent Posts

    • U.S. District Court Dismisses Hunter v. US Dept of Education Lawsuit

      U.S. District Court Dismisses Hunter v. US Dept of Education Lawsuit

      February 5, 2023
    • Colorado Court: Baker Must Provide "Non-Expressive" Cake to Transgender Customer

      Colorado Court: Baker Must Provide "Non-Expressive" Cake to Transgender Customer

      January 30, 2023
    • Supreme Court to Hear Christian Postal Employee Religious Discrimination Claim - Groff v. DeJoy

      Supreme Court to Hear Christian Postal Employee Religious Discrimination Claim - Groff v. DeJoy

      January 13, 2023
    • Analysis of AB 2098 and Its Potential to Suppress Free Speech of Medical Professionals in California

      Analysis of AB 2098 and Its Potential to Suppress Free Speech of Medical Professionals in California

      January 11, 2023
    • Idaho Supreme Court Denies Petition to Recognize Fundamental Right to Abortion

      Idaho Supreme Court Denies Petition to Recognize Fundamental Right to Abortion

      January 9, 2023

    We are not a law firm, do not provide any legal services, legal advice or “lawyer referral services” and do not provide or participate in any legal representation.

    ©2023 ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom® | WordPress Theme by Superb Themes
    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experience, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    {title} {title} {title}