Menu
ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Articles
ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®

LGBTQ+ Students Sue to Eliminate Title IX Religious Exemption

Posted on April 2, 2021April 6, 2021 by ReligiousLiberty.TV
https://dd1.f06.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/5710166_1617723857.mp3

A group of current and former LGBTQ+ students have sued the U.S. Department of Education to either force their colleges, universities, and seminaries to change their policies or to stop providing federal financial assistance. The complaint, Hunter v. U.S. Department of Education,  filed in federal court in Oregon, argues that by refusing to enforce nondiscrimination provisions against religious colleges, LGBTQ+ students face expulsion, denial of campus services, and face “institutionalized shame, fear, anxiety, and loneliness.” Although Title IX has an exemption for religious institutions, there are several reasons why the plaintiffs could prevail.

In 1983, the Supreme Court ruled that the IRS could permissibly eliminate Bob Jones University’s tax-exempt status, which had a policy prohibiting interracial dating. The Court limited the decision to educational institutions, not churches, but stated that “Government has a fundamental, overriding interest in eradicating racial discrimination in education . . . which substantially outweighs whatever burden denial of tax benefits places on [the University’s] exercise of their religious beliefs.”

In 2020, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that the federal prohibition of discrimination based on sex included not only male and female but also LGBTQ+ categories. Justice Gorsuch wrote the Court’s opinion, stating, “[I]t is impossible to discriminate against a person for being homosexual or transgender without discriminating against that individual based on sex.”

While Title IX is arguably a piece of legislation from Congress, based on the 2020 decision, the Court is not likely to defer to Congress for clarification. The religious institution exemption may also be weakened by the Bob Jones University decision since same-sex marriage was recognized as a “fundamental right” by the Supreme Court in 2015 in Obergefell v. Hodges.

The case, which is presently at the trial level in Oregon, will likely have significant ramifications for religious colleges and universities nationwide that have become dependent on federal financial support. Among the institutions named in the lawsuit are: Bob Jones University, Baylor University, Nyack College, Union University (Jackson, Tennessee), Brigham Young University, Lipscomb University, Fuller Theological Seminary, York College, Cedarville University, Clarks Summit University, Oklahoma Baptist University, Toccoa Falls Colleges, Messiah University, Dordt University, Indiana Wesleyan University, Azusa Pacific University, La Sierra University, and Liberty University.

Government money rarely comes without strings attached.

We will continue follow this case as it proceeds.

 

 

 

Tweets by RelLibertyTV

Recent Posts

  • U.S. District Court Dismisses Hunter v. US Dept of Education Lawsuit

    U.S. District Court Dismisses Hunter v. US Dept of Education Lawsuit

    February 5, 2023
  • Colorado Court: Baker Must Provide "Non-Expressive" Cake to Transgender Customer

    Colorado Court: Baker Must Provide "Non-Expressive" Cake to Transgender Customer

    January 30, 2023
  • Supreme Court to Hear Christian Postal Employee Religious Discrimination Claim - Groff v. DeJoy

    Supreme Court to Hear Christian Postal Employee Religious Discrimination Claim - Groff v. DeJoy

    January 13, 2023
  • Analysis of AB 2098 and Its Potential to Suppress Free Speech of Medical Professionals in California

    Analysis of AB 2098 and Its Potential to Suppress Free Speech of Medical Professionals in California

    January 11, 2023
  • Idaho Supreme Court Denies Petition to Recognize Fundamental Right to Abortion

    Idaho Supreme Court Denies Petition to Recognize Fundamental Right to Abortion

    January 9, 2023

We are not a law firm, do not provide any legal services, legal advice or “lawyer referral services” and do not provide or participate in any legal representation.

©2023 ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom® | WordPress Theme by Superb Themes
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experience, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}