Inconsistent Liberty: How the Ninth Circuit Both Wields and Wrecks Employment Division v. Smith within 72 Hours
Federal appellate jurisprudence often demands a strong stomach, yet rarely has a single court exhibited such breathtaking intellectual…
Research desk
Cases, courts, clauses, statutes, and coverage in one searchable publication archive.
Current events
Federal appellate jurisprudence often demands a strong stomach, yet rarely has a single court exhibited such breathtaking intellectual…
Photo: iStockPhoto.com Nearly everyone in the Lindsay Clancy case has an advocate. Clancy has defense lawyers arguing that…
Federal appellate jurisprudence often demands a strong stomach, but rarely has a single court exhibited such breathtaking cognitive…
Rulings · filings · arguments
A fast read on the legal and public-policy developments worth putting on your calendar.
Open case libraryReporting and analysis
How Rome, Paul, and History Remembered a Forgotten Pioneer
When the state decides to medicalize suicide, it rarely stops at permitting the act.
A look at why civil legal advocacy remains an essential shield for the church in an imperfect world.
By Michael Peabody -
By lowering the legal bar to a simple "best interest" standard, Maine courts have created an urgent federal question for the U.S. Supreme Court.
The easiest way to understand the law is not by memorizing dense statutory codes, but by watching what happens when two reasonable, everyday rights collide…