Menu
ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Articles
ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®

U.S. District Court Dismisses Hunter v. US Dept of Education Lawsuit

Posted on February 5, 2023February 5, 2023 by ReligiousLiberty.TV ReligiousLiberty.TV

A U.S. District Court has dismissed a lawsuit brought against the United States Department of Education, ruling that religious liberty protections for colleges and universities should remain intact.

The court’s ruling came in response to a lawsuit brought by a group of LGBT students who argued that religious liberty protections should not be allowed to interfere with the rights of LGBT students.

The lawsuit was filed last year by the LGBT student group, “the Religious Exemption Accountability Project,” which argued that religious liberty protections should not be allowed to interfere with the rights of LGBT students attending religious colleges that received government funding. 

The LGBT students argued that these religious liberty protections should be revoked in order to protect LGBT students from discrimination. US District Court Judge Ann Aikin disagreed with the LGBT students’ argument, ruling that while the religious liberty exemptions do not necessarily condone discrimination against LGBT students, they are necessary to protect the religious liberty of colleges and universities.

The judge noted that the Supreme Court has long held that religious liberty protections are essential to the free exercise of religion. The government and The Council for Christian Colleges and Universities, which had intervened in the case to protect member institutions’ interests, had argued that religious liberty protections are necessary to protect religious institutions from government interference. The Supreme Court and the Ninth Circuit have upheld religious exemptions to discrimination provisions, wrote the Judge because they “constituted a secular purpose by protecting the exercise of religion in institutions from unwarranted and substantial infringement.” Judge Aikin also cited Pieszak v. Glendale Adventist Med. Ctr., 112 F. Supp. 2d 970, noting that a “broad religious exemption to California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act constituted ‘a permissible legislative purpose.'”

Congress may also “carve out a religious exemption from otherwise neutral, generally applicable laws based on its power to enact the underlying statute in the first place.”

The Plaintiffs failed to demonstrate that the exceptions that allowed religious institutions to discriminate violated the Establishment Clause or that Defendant, the government, had violated Plaintiff’s religious beliefs.

The institutions named in the lawsuit included Bob Jones University, Baylor University, Nyack College, Union University (Jackson, Tennessee), Brigham Young University, Lipscomb University, Fuller Theological Seminary, York College, Cedarville University, Clarks Summit University, Oklahoma Baptist University, Toccoa Falls Colleges, Messiah University, Dordt University, Indiana Wesleyan University, Azusa Pacific University, La Sierra University, and Liberty University.

The January 12, 2023 ruling is likely to be appealed.

Hunter v. United States Department of Education and Council for Christian Colleges and Universities.

Tweets by RelLibertyTV

Recent Posts

  • Colorado Court: Baker Must Provide "Non-Expressive" Cake to Transgender Customer

    Colorado Court: Baker Must Provide "Non-Expressive" Cake to Transgender Customer

    January 30, 2023
  • Supreme Court to Hear Christian Postal Employee Religious Discrimination Claim - Groff v. DeJoy

    Supreme Court to Hear Christian Postal Employee Religious Discrimination Claim - Groff v. DeJoy

    January 13, 2023
  • Analysis of AB 2098 and Its Potential to Suppress Free Speech of Medical Professionals in California

    Analysis of AB 2098 and Its Potential to Suppress Free Speech of Medical Professionals in California

    January 11, 2023
  • Idaho Supreme Court Denies Petition to Recognize Fundamental Right to Abortion

    Idaho Supreme Court Denies Petition to Recognize Fundamental Right to Abortion

    January 9, 2023
  • Exploring the Potential Risks of CBDC - Privacy, Freedom and Economy Impacts

    Exploring the Potential Risks of CBDC - Privacy, Freedom and Economy Impacts

    December 29, 2022

We are not a law firm, do not provide any legal services, legal advice or “lawyer referral services” and do not provide or participate in any legal representation.

©2023 ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom® | WordPress Theme by Superb Themes
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experience, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}