Hubersberger v. State

Religious motivation does not provide immunity from neutral criminal laws protecting private property; the state may prosecute trespassers even when conduct is religiously motivated when it serves compelling governmental interests.

ReligiousLiberty.TV
February 26, 2026
0 min read
Citation: 2 CA-CV 2025-0188 Year: 2026
Holding: Religious motivation does not provide immunity from neutral criminal laws protecting private property; the state may prosecute trespassers even when conduct is religiously motivated when it serves compelling governmental interests.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 appeals2.az.gov PDF

Hubersberger v. State (2 CA-CV 2025-0188) is a Free Exercise case in 2026. The court held that religious motivation does not provide immunity from neutral criminal laws protecting private property; the state may prosecute trespassers even when conduct is religiously motivated when it serves compelling governmental interests.