Holding: Religious motivation does not provide immunity from neutral criminal laws protecting private property; the state may prosecute trespassers even when conduct is religiously motivated when it serves compelling governmental interests.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.
Official Documents
Hubersberger v. State (2 CA-CV 2025-0188) is a Free Exercise case in 2026. The court held that religious motivation does not provide immunity from neutral criminal laws protecting private property; the state may prosecute trespassers even when conduct is religiously motivated when it serves compelling governmental interests.