Judge dismisses pension funding case against religious hospital chain
This decision is a good primer on the actual harm element requirement needed in order to have standing in Federal Court.
Archive
This decision is a good primer on the actual harm element requirement needed in order to have standing in Federal Court.
When jurors are selected for trial in Federal court, they are asked to adopt the phrase "so help me God." What happens when they take…
The Supreme Court announced today that it would hear arguments in two employment cases involving whether teachers in Catholic Schools can file lawsuits in pursuit…
The Solicitor General of the United States, Noel Francisco, has recommended that the United States Supreme Court agree to consider a Sabbath accommodation case involving…
The United States (U.S.) Supreme Court agreed to hear a case, Espinoza v. Montana Dept. of Revenue, concerning a Montana state legislative program that allowed individuals…
There's an old adage that bad facts make bad law, and in this case, given political exigencies, there was little to no chance that the…
The Free Exercise Clause that guarantees religious freedom is much weaker than most people realize. While freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of…
The Supreme Court issued a ruling on June 3, 2019, in a case (Fort Bend County v. Davis) involving whether a court may hear a…
Too broad an exception from neutral, generally applicable law, and protections against discrimination vanish. Too narrow an exception and free exercise of religion protections vanish.…
Taking the significance of the public health emergency and religious beliefs into account when deciding what to do in these circumstances is difficult. It is…