The case alleges that Quebec City violated religious freedom and freedom of expression by cancelling a Christian worship event featuring Sean Feucht without constitutional justification.
By ReligiousLiberty.TV • February 26, 2026 • U.S. Const. amend. I
Cite This Case
Burn 24/7 Canada v. City of Quebec (2025).
✓ Copied!Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.
Burn 24/7 Canada v. City of Quebec (State Appellate Court, 2025). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/burn-24-7-canada/
✓ Copied!For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.
Burn 24/7 Canada v. City of Quebec [State Appellate Court, 2025] — The case alleges that Quebec City violated religious freedom and freedom of expression by cancelling a Christian worship event featuring Sean Feucht without constitutional justification. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/burn-24-7-canada/, accessed October 28, 2026).
✓ Copied!For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.
Year: 2025 Court: State Appellate Court Outcome:Pending
Holding: The case alleges that Quebec City violated religious freedom and freedom of expression by cancelling a Christian worship event featuring Sean Feucht without constitutional justification.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.
Burn 24/7 Canada v. City of Quebec is a Free Exercise case decided by the State Appellate Court in 2025. The court held that the case alleges that Quebec City violated religious freedom and freedom of expression by cancelling a Christian worship event featuring Sean Feucht without constitutional justification. The case resulted in a Pending outcome.