FIRST AMENDMENT • SUPREME COURT DOCKETS • APPELLATE WIRE Monday, October 26, 2026 // ARCHIVAL BROADSHEET EDITION
Constitutional Jurisprudence & Broadcast Dispatches

ReligiousLiberty.TV

Federal / State Docket // Archival Dispatch

Dad’s Place v. Bryan, Ohio (regulatory appeal)

The Ohio Sixth District Court of Appeals remanded the case with orders to apply strict scrutiny to a church's claim that overnight shelter operations in its sanctuary constitute protected religious exercise exempt from fire code sprinkler system requirements.
Cite This Case
Dad's Place v. Bryan, Ohio (regulatory appeal), No. 13283.
✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
Dad's Place v. Bryan, Ohio (regulatory appeal), No. 13283 . https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/dads-place-2/
✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
Dad's Place v. Bryan, Ohio (regulatory appeal) (No. 13283) — The Ohio Sixth District Court of Appeals remanded the case with orders to apply strict scrutiny to a church's claim that overnight shelter operations in its sanctuary constitute protected religious exercise exempt from fire code sprinkler system requirements. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/dads-place-2/, accessed October 26, 2026).
✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
Citation: 13283 Outcome: Remanded
Holding: The Ohio Sixth District Court of Appeals remanded the case with orders to apply strict scrutiny to a church's claim that overnight shelter operations in its sanctuary constitute protected religious exercise exempt from fire code sprinkler system requirements.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 lcapps.co.lucas.oh.us PDF

Dad's Place v. Bryan, Ohio (regulatory appeal) (13283) is a Free Exercise case. The court held that the Ohio Sixth District Court of Appeals remanded the case with orders to apply strict scrutiny to a church's claim that overnight shelter operations in its sanctuary constitute protected religious exercise exempt from fire code sprinkler system requirements. The case resulted in a Remanded outcome.