Employment Division v. Smith

Q: What court decided Smith?

Employment Division v. Smith was decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1990.

Q: What is the citation for Smith?

The official citation for Employment Division v. Smith is 494 U.S. 872.

Q: What legal issues are involved in Smith?

Employment Division v. Smith involves the following religious liberty issues: Free Exercise.

Federal / State Docket // Archival Dispatch

Religious liberty claims are subject to neutral laws of general applicability without strict scrutiny review.

By ReligiousLiberty.TV • February 26, 2026 • U.S. Const. amend. I

Cite This Case

Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990).

✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).

Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (U.S. Supreme Court, 1990). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/employment-division-v-smith-2/

✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.

Employment Division v. Smith (494 U.S. 872) [U.S. Supreme Court, 1990] — Religious liberty claims are subject to neutral laws of general applicability without strict scrutiny review. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/employment-division-v-smith-2/, accessed October 31, 2026).

✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.

Citation: 494 U.S. 872 Year: 1990 Court: U.S. Supreme Court

Free Exercise

Holding: Religious liberty claims are subject to neutral laws of general applicability without strict scrutiny review.

Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Official Documents

📄 Read Opinion Article link

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 Justia opinion

Supreme Court Petition Pits Baker Against California in High-Stakes Cake Clash September 5, 2025
Cited as context
The Double Edge of Religious Liberty: How the “Most Favored Nation” Theory Cuts Both Ways August 15, 2025
Cited as context
Free Exercise Rights Are Expanding — and the Establishment Clause Is Cracking August 15, 2025
Cited as context
High Court hands Catholic Social Services narrowly drafted victory June 18, 2021
Cited as context
Colorado Court: Baker Must Provide "Non-Expressive" Cake to Transgender Customer January 30, 2023
Cited as context
Supreme Court: State must include church in public funding scheme June 26, 2017
Cited as context
Legal Analysis: Zubik petitioners may have pushed argument too far March 24, 2016
Cited as context 📎 Oyez opinion
Black Friday and Blue Laws: Renewed Calls for Uniform Rest Days November 29, 2012
Cited as context
Church Fined $1.2 Million for Worship During COVID Restrictions Asks Supreme Court for Relief December 19, 2025
Cited as context
Supreme Court agrees to hear Philadelphia faith-based adoption agency case February 24, 2020
Cited as context
Another cake case gives Court opportunity to resolve free exercise confusion April 24, 2019
Cited as context
Washington court finds no free exercise right to ignore antidiscrimination law February 17, 2017
Cited as context
New Supreme Court Case Could Stretch RFRA to Breaking Point November 13, 2015
Cited as context
Supreme Court to Decide: Can states force artists to speak contrary to their faith? February 23, 2022
Cited as context
Bill Would Limit Scope of Religious Freedom Restoration Act June 2, 2016
Cited as context
Why Using "Landmark Status" to Block the NY Mosque is a Threat to Religious Land Use Rights July 22, 2010
Cited as context
ANALYSIS: California Supreme Court unanimously rules that physicians cannot withhold fertility treatments to homosexuals August 18, 2008
Cited as context
Europe's Secular Crackdown and the American Exception April 1, 2026
Cited as context 📎 Justia opinion

Employment Division v. Smith (494 U.S. 872) is a Free Exercise case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1990. The court held that religious liberty claims are subject to neutral laws of general applicability without strict scrutiny review.