Federal / State Docket // Archival Dispatch
Jeanpierre v. Trump
U.S. Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg ruled that Executive Order 14253 did not substantially burden the plaintiff's religious exercise because the order imposed no penalties, compelled no speech, and made no direct contact with the plaintiff.
Cite This Case
Jeanpierre v. Trump, No. 2:25-cv-00290 (D. 2025).
✓ Copied!
Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
Jeanpierre v. Trump, No. 2:25-cv-00290 (U.S. District Court, 2025). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/jeanpierre/
✓ Copied!
For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
Jeanpierre v. Trump (No. 2:25-cv-00290) [U.S. District Court, 2025] — U.S. Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg ruled that Executive Order 14253 did not substantially burden the plaintiff's religious exercise because the order imposed no penalties, compelled no speech, and made no direct contact with the plaintiff. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/jeanpierre/, accessed October 27, 2026).
✓ Copied!
For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
Holding: U.S. Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg ruled that Executive Order 14253 did not substantially burden the plaintiff's religious exercise because the order imposed no penalties, compelled no speech, and made no direct contact with the plaintiff.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.
Official Documents
Jeanpierre v. Trump (2:25-cv-00290) is a Free Exercise case decided by the U.S. District Court in 2025. The court held that u.S. Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg ruled that Executive Order 14253 did not substantially burden the plaintiff's religious exercise because the order imposed no penalties, compelled no speech, and made no direct contact with the plaintiff.